In this presentation, we discuss preliminary findings from a study of the introduction of EMI into a university spectroscopy course at National Taiwan Normal University. Earlier work has suggested that EMI requires either more teaching time than L1, or a reduction in content (Airey, 2015). In this particular instantiation of EMI, however, the same content is covered in the same time, by adopting a flipped classroom approach. We describe the initial choices made, the data collected, and the benefits and challenges we observed for both teacher and students. Students were, on the whole, happy with their learning although they did report spending more time working outside class. Unsurprisingly, we find that the lecturer needs to invest a large amount of time in making the videos and planning how to use the flipped classroom time effectively. Moreover, the lecturer needs to have a good, spontaneous command of disciplinary English in order to cope with student questions as they arise “on-the-fly.”
References
Airey, J. (2015). From stimulated recall to disciplinary literacy: Summarizing ten years of research into teaching and learning in English. In Slobodanka Dimova, Anna Kristina Hultgren, & Christian Jensen (Eds.), English-Medium Instruction in European Higher Education. English in Europe, Volume 3 (pp. 157-176): De Gruyter Mouton.
Airey, J. (2016). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English for Academic Purposes (EAP). In Hyland, K. & Shaw, P. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. (pp. 71-83) London: Routledge.
Airey, J. (2017). CLIL: Combining Language and Content. ESP Today, 5(2), 297-302.
Airey, J., & Larsson, J. (2018). Developing Students’ Disciplinary Literacy? The Case of University Physics. In K.-S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education: Springer.
Airey, J., Lauridsen, K., Raisanen, A., Salö, L., & Schwach, V. (2016). The Expansion of English-medium Instruction in the Nordic Countries. Can Top-down University Language Policies Encourage Bottom-up Disciplinary Literacy Goals? Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9950-2
Airey, J. (2020). The content lecturer and English-medium instruction (EMI): epilogue to the special issue on EMI in higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1732290
Airey, J. (2023). Disciplinary Literacy and English-Medium Instruction. Presented at the Language Issues in English-Medium Instruction 22nd-23rd April 2023 Keynote speaker. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-216744
Airey, J. (2025). Disciplinary Literacy and English-Medium Instruction: Multilingual, Multimodal and Multifunctional Considerations. In Language Issues in English Medium Instruction (pp. 48-59). Routledge.
Kuteeva, M., & Airey, J. (2014). Disciplinary Differences in the Use of English in Higher Education: Reflections on Recent Policy Developments Higher Education, 67(5), 533-549. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9660-6
Thøgersen, J., & Airey, J. (2011). Lecturing undergraduate science in Danish and in English: A comparison of speaking rate and rhetorical style. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 209-221.