This paper revisits the effect of gender on portfolio performance, exploring the hypothesis that investors may derive fewer benefits from increased financial attention due to disparities in financial confidence. Using data from trading accounts of over 745,000 investors, we find that the difference in investment performance between men and women depends on the level of attention that they pay to their portfolios. Furthermore, our results indicate that the positive effects of investor attention are primarily attributable to young men, who appear to benefit the most from heightened attentiveness.

The Fintech sector is traditionally viewed as a convergence of finance and technology. This study examines its characteristics by analysing Fintech stock returns relative to traditional sector portfolios using stepwise regression. Our findings show that Fintech stocks align more closely with the business services sector than with the financial or technology sectors, challenging conventional classification. Additionally, while Fintech indexes initially generated positive alpha, this advantage diminished as the sector matured. These results offer new insights into sector benchmarking and portfolio diversification.

We investigate the effects of using different sources of investment leverage, that is, securities with embedded leverage and traditional margin accounts, on the portfolio performance of retail investors, recognizing that these effects may be conditional on investor attention. We find that investors who trade on margin underperform those who do not have margin accounts; we also find that investors trading securities with embedded leverage show even poorer performance than investors trading on margin. The negative effect of leverage usage, however, decreases with greater investor attention, measured by portfolio monitoring frequency. Results suggest that more attentive investors gain more from using investment leverage.

This paper contributes to the literature by examining whether the age and gender of the firm's top executives influence market-based measures of firm risk. Using data on the S&P 1500 firms, we document that chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO) age and gender have a direct effect on market-based firm risk measures in addition to the indirect influence they may have through corporate policy choices. Specifically, we find that firms led by older CEOs and CFOs have less volatile stock returns and lower idiosyncratic risk. Although the relationship between executive gender and firm risk is more equivocal, our results suggest that female-led firms are associated with lower levels of total and idiosyncratic risks after controlling for firm-specific attributes, policy choices, and managerial risk-taking incentives. We also document that CEO and CFO age and gender do not influence the level of systematic risk. Overall, our empirical findings demonstrate that the age and gender of the firm's top executives may have important implications for firm riskiness.

We explore a unique dataset on individual investors' online trading accounts to examine the determinants of their attention and its relation to portfolio performance. In particular, we investigate what individual characteristics affect investor attention and what type of information drives investment performance. We find distinct differences in investors' attention and provide evidence that paying attention has a differential impact on performance depending on the type of information. Portfolio monitoring and attention to financial education are positively related to performance, while attention to analytical information is detrimental to performance. Attention to technical analysis is negatively related to the performance of actively trading investors but improves the performance of less frequent traders. Overall, our results provide additional evidence to the suggestion that attention to financial education is the key to investment success.

The authors studied the complex relationship between information supply and demand using newspaper articles and web searches that reflect investors' crash fears. They report that more web searches lead to more news, whereas more news does not have that effect on web search in the future. The authors show also that web searches have an immediate effect on stock market returns and the VIX implied volatility, whereas the effect of news articles lasts longer, up to 11 weeks. The results suggest collectively that the web searches related to market crashes lead both the printed news stories about market crashes.