In the search for the neural correlates of auditory consciousness, a candidate has been found using electroencephalography: the auditory awareness negativity (AAN). Earlier studies have investigated the AAN in response to lateralized sound. With headphones, there is a clear lateralization of AAN when two auditory lateralization cues are combined: the interaural level difference (ILD) and interaural time difference (ITD). To separate the contribution of these cues to a lateralized AAN, we tested three stimulus conditions with headphones: A combination of ILD and ITD, solely ITD, and monaural stimulation. Results suggest that ILD and ITD are required in conjunction for a lateralized AAN, and neither ITD nor monaural stimulation can yield a lateralized AAN. These results suggest that event-related potentials may be limited in measuring the lateralization of the neural correlates of auditory consciousness to lateralized sounds, depending on auditory cues and acoustic environment.

Within neuroscience, biological markers of consciousness are known as the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs). Electrophysiological data have suggested two candidate NCCs in hearing: the auditory awareness negativity (AAN), and late positivity (LP). The AAN is linked to phenomenal awareness of sound, and the LP to post-perceptual behavioral response and executive control. Earlier research on the analogs of the AAN in both vision and touch found topographical mapping onto the cerebral hemisphere that is contralateral to stimulus source. Similar research has not been conducted on the AAN. Sound localization is the ability to perceive spatial locations of sound sources. Localization of sound in the horizontal dimension utilizes binaural cues of time and intensity differences. Sound is typically perceived from outside the head and is localized to a physical space (sound localization). When sound is perceived within the head, by using headphones, sound is instead lateralized to the left or right along an intracranial axis (sound lateralization). The thesis comprised three studies of threshold-level identification tasks, where listeners were tasked to localize laterally displaced sounds. The first study tested the NCCs to sound lateralization using a binaural click stimulus that was lateralized randomly toward either ear, presented through headphones. Then, the second study tested the NCCs to sound localization using a square pulse stimulus played from random positions in a semicircular array of thirteen horizontally displaced equidistant loudspeakers. In the third study, the NCCs to different binaural cues in sound lateralization were tested, specifically manipulating differences in time and intensity with the same stimulus and equipment used in the first study. The overall results showed that the AAN contralaterally changes in relation to experienced sound source only in sound lateralization, and only in the tested condition where binaural cues of time and intensity differences were combined. The LP showed a hemispheric contralateral effect in relation to experienced sound source, but only to sound localization. This contralateral effect may be an attentional artifact of audiovisual integration, as the loudspeakers were seen by the listeners. The thesis suggests that the NCCs to sound localization and sound lateralization differ in expression based on hearing medium.

The neurological basis for perceptual awareness remains unclear, and theories disagree as to whether sensory cortices per se generate awareness. Critically, neural activity in the sensory cortices is only a neural correlate of consciousness (NCC) if it closely matches the contents of perceptual awareness. Research in vision and touch suggest that contralateral activity in sensory cortices is an NCC. Similarly, research in hearing with two sound sources (left and right) presented over headphones also suggests that a candidate NCC called the auditory awareness negativity (AAN) matches perceived location of sound. The current study used 13 different sound sources presented over loudspeakers for natural localization cues and measured event-related potentials to a threshold stimulus in a sound localization task. Preregistered Bayesian mixed models provided moderate evidence against an overall AAN and very strong evidence against its lateralization. Because of issues regarding data quantity and quality, exploratory analyses with aggregated data from multiple loudspeakers were conducted. Results provided moderate evidence for an overall AAN and strong evidence against its lateralization. Nonetheless, the interpretations of these results remain inconclusive. Therefore, future research should reduce the number of conditions and/or test over several sessions to procure a sufficient amount of data. Taken at face value, the results may suggest issues with AAN as an NCC of auditory awareness, as it does not laterally map onto experiences in a free-field auditory environment, in contrast to the NCCs of vision and touch.

Echolocation is the ability to gather information from sound reflections. Most previous studies have focused on the ability to detect sound reflections, others on the ability to localize sound reflections, but no previous study has compared the two abilities in the same individuals. Our study compared echo-detection (reflecting object present or not?) and echo-localization (reflecting object to the left or right?) in 10 inexperienced sighted participants across 10 distances (1-4.25 m) to the reflecting object, using an automated system for studying human echolocation. There were substantial individual differences, particularly in the performance on the echo-localization task. However, most participants performed better on the detection than the localization task, in particular at the closest distances (1 and 1.7 m), illustrating that it sometimes may be hard to perceive whether an audible reflection came from the left or right.

It may be difficult to determine whether a dichotic lag-click points to the left or right when preceded by a diotic lead-click. Previous research suggests that this loss of spatial information is most prominent at inter-click intervals (ICIs) <10 ms. However, a study by Nilsson, Tirado, and Szychowska [(2019). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 512–524] found support for loss of spatial information in lag-clicks at much longer ICIs using a stimulus setup differing from those in previous research. The present study used a setup similar to that of the Nilsson, Tirado, and Szychowska study [(2019). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 512–524] to measure 13 listeners' ability to lateralize (left versus right) and detect (present versus absent) the lag-click in lead–lag click pairs with ICIs of 6–48 ms. The main finding was distinct individual differences in performance. Some listeners could lateralize lag-clicks all the way down to their detection threshold, whereas others had lateralization thresholds substantially higher than their detection thresholds, i.e., they could not lateralize lag-clicks that they could easily detect. Two such listeners trained for 30 days and managed to improve their lateralization thresholds to reach their detection thresholds, but only at longer ICIs (>20 ms), suggesting different mechanisms underlying lag-click lateralization at short versus long ICIs.

Theories disagree as to whether it is the early or the late neural correlate of awareness that plays a critical role in phenomenal awareness. According to recurrent processing theory, early activity in primary sensory areas corresponds closely to phenomenal awareness. In support, research with electroencephalography found that in the visual and somatosensory modality, an early neural correlate of awareness is contralateral to the perceived side of stimulation. Thus, early activity is sensitive to the perceived side of visual and somatosensory stimulation. Critically, it is unresolved whether this is true also for hearing. In the present study (N = 26 students), Bayesian analyses showed that the early neural correlate of awareness (auditory awareness negativity, AAN) was stronger for contralateral than ipsilateral electrodes whereas the late correlate of auditory awareness (late positivity, LP) was not lateralized. These findings demonstrate that the early but not the late neural correlate of auditory awareness reflects lateralized experiences. Thus, these findings imply that AAN is a more suitable NCC than LP because it correlates more closely with lateralized experiences.

Research suggests that the electrophysiological correlates of consciousness are similar in hearing as in vision: the auditory awareness negativity (AAN) and the late positivity (LP). However, from a recently proposed signal-detection perspective, these correlates may be confounded by performance, as the strength of the internal responses differs between aware and unaware trials. Here, we tried to apply this signal-detection approach to correct for performance in an auditory discrimination and detection task (N = 28). A large proportion of subjects had to be excluded because even a small response bias distorted the correction. For the remaining subjects, the correction mainly increased noise in the measurement. Furthermore, the signal-detection approach is theoretically problematic because it may isolate post-perceptual processes and eliminate awareness-related activity. Therefore, we conclude that AAN and LP are not confounded by performance and that the contrastive analysis identifies both as correlates of awareness.

In hearing, two neural correlates of awareness are the auditory awareness negativity (AAN) and the late positivity (LP). These correlates of auditory awareness are typically observed with tasks in which subjects are required to report their awareness with manual responses. Thus, the correlates may be confounded by this manual response requirement. We manipulated the response requirement in a tone detection task (N = 52). Tones were presented at each subject’s individual awareness threshold while high-density electroencephalography (EEG) activity was recorded. In one response condition, subjects pushed a button if they were aware of the tone and withheld responding if they were unaware of the tone. In the other condition, subjects pushed a button if they were unaware of the tone and withheld responding if they were aware of the tone. To capture AAN and LP, difference waves were computed between aware and unaware trials, separately for trials in which responses were required and trials in which responses were not required. Results suggest that AAN and LP are unaffected by the response requirement. These findings imply that in hearing, early and late correlates of awareness are not confounded by a manual response requirement. Furthermore, the results suggest that AAN originates from bilateral auditory cortices, supporting the view that AAN is a neural correlate of localized recurrent processing in early sensory areas.