Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Higher survival of aposematic prey in close encounters with predators – an experimental study of detection distance.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Ethology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3445-3759
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Animal Ecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6319-009X
2009 (English)In: Animal Behaviour, ISSN 0003-3472, E-ISSN 1095-8282, Vol. 78, p. 111-116Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aposematic animals are often conspicuous. It has been hypothesized that one function of conspicuousness in such prey is to be detected from afar by potential predators: the ‘detection distance hypothesis’. The hypothesis states that predators are less prone to attack at long detection range because more time is allowed for making the ‘correct’ decision not to attack the unprofitable prey. The detection distance hypothesis has gained some experimental support in that time-limited predators make more mistakes. To investigate effects of prey presentation distance we performed two experiments. First, in experiment 1, we investigated at what distance chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, could see the difference in colour between aposematic and plain mealworms. Birds chose the correct track in a two-way choice when prey were at 20, 40 and 60 cm distance but not at 80 cm. Second, in experiment 2, fifth-instar larvae of the aposematic bug Lygaeus equestris were presented to experienced chicks at 2, 20 or 60 cm distance. We found no difference in attack probability between distances. However, prey mortality was significantly lower for the shortest presentation distance. In conclusion, we found no support for the hypothesis that aposematic prey benefit from long-range detection; in fact they benefit from shortdistance detection. This result, and others, suggests that the conspicuousness of aposematic prey at a distance may simply be a by-product of an efficient signalling function after detection.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
elsevier , 2009. Vol. 78, p. 111-116
Keywords [en]
attack mortality, attention, detection distance, domestic chick, foraging behaviour, Gallus gallus domesticus, Lygaeus equestris, warning coloration
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Zoology; Ethology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-28737DOI: doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.015ISI: 000267154000017OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-28737DiVA, id: diva2:225356
Available from: 2009-06-26 Created: 2009-06-26 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Gamberale-Stille, GabriellaTullberg, Birgitta S.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gamberale-Stille, GabriellaTullberg, Birgitta S.
By organisation
EthologyDepartment of ZoologyAnimal Ecology
In the same journal
Animal Behaviour
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 547 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf