Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating quality of hospital care using time-to-event endpoints based on patient follow-up data
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Matematiska institutionen. Federal Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), Germany.
Rekke forfattare: 22019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, ISSN 1387-3741, E-ISSN 1572-9400, Vol. 19, nr 4, s. 197-214Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Revisions of hip and knee arthroplasty implants and cardiac pacemakers pose a large medical and economic burden for society. Consequently, the identification of health care providers with potential for quality improvements regarding the reduction of revision rates is a central aim of quality assurance in any healthcare system. Even though the time span between initial and possible subsequent operations is a classical time-to-event endpoint, hospital-specific quality indicators are in practice often measured as revisions within a fixed follow-up period and subsequently analyzed by traditional methods like proportions or logistic regression. Methods from survival analysis, in contrast, allow the inclusion of all observations, i.e. also those with early censoring or events, and make thus more efficient and more timely use of the available data than traditional methods. This may be obvious to a statistician but in an applied context with historic traditions, the introduction of more complicated methods needs a clear presentation of their added value. We demonstrate how standard survival methods like the Kaplan-Meier estimator and a multiplicative hazards model outperform traditional methods with regard to the identification of performance outliers. Following that, we use the proposed methods to analyze 640,000 hip and knee replacement operations with about 13,000 revisions between 2015 and 2016 in more than 1200 German hospitals in the annual evaluation of quality of care. Based on the results, performance outliers are identified which are to be further investigated qualitatively with regard to their provided quality of care and possible necessary measures for improvement. Survival analysis is a sound statistical framework for analyzing data in the context of quality assurance and survival methods outperform the statistical methods that are traditionally used in this area.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2019. Vol. 19, nr 4, s. 197-214
Emneord [en]
Quality assurance, Quality of care, Survival analysis, Stochastic process control
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-176677DOI: 10.1007/s10742-019-00202-7ISI: 000494473300001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-176677DiVA, id: diva2:1377972
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-12-13 Laget: 2019-12-13 Sist oppdatert: 2019-12-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Höhle, Michael
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 4 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf