Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM). I: Model intercomparison with current land use
Vise andre og tillknytning
2009 (engelsk)Inngår i: Advances in Water Resources, ISSN 0309-1708, E-ISSN 1872-9657, Vol. 32, nr 2, s. 129-146Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper introduces the project on 'Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM)' that aims at investigating the envelope of predictions on changes in hydrological fluxes due to land use change. As part of a series of four papers, this paper outlines the motivation and setup of LUCHEM, and presents a model intercomparison for the present-day simulation results. Such an intercomparison provides a valuable basis to investigate the effects of different model structures on model predictions and paves the ground for the analysis of the performance of multi-model ensembles and the reliability of the scenario predictions in companion papers. in this study, we applied a set of 10 lumped, semi-lumped and fully distributed hydrological models that have been previously used in land use change studies to the low mountainous Dill catchment. Germany. Substantial differences in model performance were observed with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies ranging from 0.53 to 0.92. Differences in model performance were attributed to (1) model input data, (2) model calibration and (3) the physical basis of the models. The models were applied with two sets of input data: an original and a homogenized data set. This homogenization of precipitation, temperature and leaf area index was performed to reduce the variation between the models. Homogenization improved the comparability of model simulations and resulted in a reduced average bias, although some variation in model data input remained. The effect of the physical differences between models on the long-term water balance was mainly attributed to differences in how models represent evapotranspiration. Semi-lumped and lumped conceptual models slightly outperformed the fully distributed and physically based models. This was attributed to the automatic model calibration typically used for this type of models. Overall, however, we conclude that there was no superior model if several measures of model performance are considered and that all models are suitable to participate in further multi-model ensemble set-ups and land use change scenario investigations.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2009. Vol. 32, nr 2, s. 129-146
Emneord [en]
hydrological modeling, ensemble modeling, land use, model structure, catchment model performance, spatially-variable water, energy-balance processes, climate-change impacts, forested catchments, ecosystem processes, cover changes, project dmip, river-basin, uncertainty, simulation
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-31195DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.003ISI: 000264512000002ISBN: 0309-1708 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-31195DiVA, id: diva2:275746
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-11-06 Laget: 2009-11-06 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-12bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Seibert, Jan
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Advances in Water Resources

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 72 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf