Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholms universitets Östersjöcentrum. Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7279-0123
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1913-5197
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-9038-4786
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Journal of the Commons, ISSN 1875-0281, E-ISSN 1875-0281, Vol. 9, nr 1, s. 440-465Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investigate how the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), the international governing body for the Baltic Sea, could improve its prospects for working with the ecosystem approach, drawing from the literature on adaptive governance. We construct an ideal type of adaptive governance to which we compare the way in which HELCOM is operating and relate these dynamics to two other international marine environment governance organizations, the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). We conclude that HELCOM deviates from an ideal type of adaptive governance in several ways but also that the other two case studies provide empirical support for potential ways in which HELCOM could improve its adaptive capacity. Key aspects where HELCOM could improve include increasing stakeholder participation - both in information sharing and decision making. Further, HELCOM need to develop evaluation mechanisms, secure compliance to improve adaptive capacity and organizational effectiveness, which entails the development of structures for conflict resolution. Finally, HELCOM need to increase communication and harmonization between different levels of authority.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2015. Vol. 9, nr 1, s. 440-465
Nyckelord [en]
Adaptive governance, Baltic Sea, ecosystem approach, HELCOM
Nationell ämneskategori
Miljövetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-117062DOI: 10.18352/ijc.532ISI: 000351768000020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-117062DiVA, id: diva2:811160
Anmärkning

AuthorCount:3;

Tillgänglig från: 2015-05-11 Skapad: 2015-05-06 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-26Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Three faces of HELCOM - institution, organization, policy producer
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Three faces of HELCOM - institution, organization, policy producer
2014 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Despite early initiatives during the 1960s and 1970s, and continuing efforts ever since, the Baltic Sea remains in poor condition. The Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) is the governing body tasked with protecting the marine environment from further deterioration through intergovernmental collaboration between the Baltic Sea states and the EU. In 2007, HELCOM launched a new tool – the Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP), of which the so-called ecosystem approach is a cornerstone. However, how and why the BSAP reform was launched, and also what consequences such management reforms can have for transboundary resource management, is unknown.

By using institutional theory, organizational theory and the advocacy coalition framework, in combination with content analysis of official documents derived from HELCOM, this thesis argues that the BSAP is the end result of a gradual process of change within institutional structures and actor beliefs. This thesis also shows that HELCOM's capacity to detect, process, and react in response to changes in its regulatory objective has not changed as a consequence of the BSAP. In contrast to earlier research, it seems HELCOM responds better to slow and opaque changes than to quick and visible ones. Finally, by comparing HELCOM with two other similar cases, the thesis shows that HELCOM's adaptive capacity could be improved in line with the recommendations of the ecosystem approach.

This thesis illustrates the importance of studying the emergence of new tools for governing transboundary resources from several theoretical perspectives. The thesis uses an innovative quantitative content analysis and concludes that new methods might be required to enable such studies. The different perspectives used here give various explanations concerning the causes and consequences of the BSAP. In a future Baltic Sea, where environmental changes are likely to be abrupt, a multitude of understandings regarding the governance of the Baltic Sea will be crucial.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Stockholm: Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, 2014
Serie
Stockholm studies in politics, ISSN 0346-6620 ; 159
Nyckelord
Helsinki Commission, institutional change, policy change, organizational response, ecosystem approach, Baltic Sea, BSAP, content analysis
Nationell ämneskategori
Studier av offentlig förvaltning
Forskningsämne
statsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108455 (URN)978-91-7649-033-4 (ISBN)
Disputation
2014-12-05, hörsal 5, hus B, Universitetsvägen 10 B, Stockholm, 13:00 (Engelska)
Opponent
Handledare
Anmärkning

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: Submitted. Paper 3: Submitted. Paper 4: In press.

Tillgänglig från: 2014-11-13 Skapad: 2014-10-27 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-26Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Valman, MatildaÖsterblom, HenrikOlsson, Per
Av organisationen
Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholms universitets ÖstersjöcentrumStatsvetenskapliga institutionen
I samma tidskrift
International Journal of the Commons
Miljövetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 379 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf