Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Authority, Legitimacy and Military Violence: De Facto Combatant Privilege of Non-State Armed Groups through Amnesty
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0241-3311
2018 (English)In: International Humanitarian Law and Justice: Historical and Sociological Perspectives / [ed] Mats Deland, Mark Klamberg, Pål Wrange, Abingdon: Routledge, 2018, p. 60-75Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This chapter traces the prehistory, genesis and application of Article 6(5) of the Second Additional Protocol to the 1949 Geneva Conventions (1977) and its implications for the question of right authority. Under international law, a sovereign government has sovereign rights (and obligations) towards her subjects while the relation between belligerents is different: It is one of enmity and equality, regulated by the law of war (or international humanitarian law [IHL] or jus in bello). Rebels can be punished for using force against the sovereign, but soldiers of a belligerent not; they have the ” combatant privilege” to kill other soldiers. In present international law, this right of the sovereign (a right authority) is undermined by certain tendencies in the jus in bello. To the extent that non-state armed groups (NSAGs) can start a war without negative legal consequences and thus acquire belligerent rights, they actually have a de facto authority, or at least they are undermining the state’s exclusive authority. Article 6(5) states that ” [a]t the end of hostilities, the authorities in power shall endeavor to grant the broadest possible amnesty to persons who have participated in the armed conflict…” The many amnesty agreements concluded since, demonstrates an emerging trend towards ” retroactive combatant immunity.” Thus, rebel fighters have a reasonable chance of being provided with the ” combatant privilege,” albeit post factum.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. p. 60-75
Keywords [en]
international humanitarian law, history, amnesty, authority, non-international armed conflict
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Public International Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-164093ISBN: 9781138477551 (print)ISBN: 9781351104449 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-164093DiVA, id: diva2:1278117
Available from: 2019-01-11 Created: 2019-01-11 Last updated: 2019-01-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wrange, Pål
By organisation
Department of Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 5 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf