CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Jurisdiktion vid internationella dataskyddsöverträdelser: Förhållandet mellan GDPR och Bryssel Ia-förordningen
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
International jurisdiction over infringements of data protection : The relationship between the GDPR and the Brussels Recast Regulation (English)
Abstract [en]

With a rapid technology development it becomes easier for individuals to share their personal data. However, this also increases the processing of personal data and the risks of infringements of data protection. With an increasing globalisation the infringements of data protection frequently takes on cross border dimensions making it harder to determine where actions can be brought to enforce the data subject’s data protection rights.

This thesis examines the possible ways of interpreting the rule of jurisdiction found in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Furthermore this thesis investigates the relationship between the GDPR and the Brussels Recast Regulation regarding international jurisdiction over infringements of data protection.

After analysing judgements of the court of justice of the European Union and the scope and aims of the Regulations, the general conclusion in the thesis is that both the GDPR and the Brussels Recast Regulation can be applicable on infringements of data protection, provided that the data subject always has the opportunity to bring an action according to the jurisdictional rule of the GDPR. However, there are a lot of uncertainties that demand for an answer. These uncertainties for instance includes the question if, and in that case how, jurisdictional agreements for data privacy is allowed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019.
Keywords [sv]
Jurisdiktion, Internationell privaträtt, Dataskyddsöverträdelser, GDPR, Bryssel Ia-förordningen
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-165944OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-165944DiVA, id: diva2:1286814
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-02-11 Created: 2019-02-07 Last updated: 2019-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(614 kB)26 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 614 kBChecksum SHA-512
dcc24f93eb4d9a4c442e4fba6e899aedfa01c4b0a1b66e1eb08c2ac0be2facaeef556d7a6d0fa81ce84536165b7499160d824e1f0a0c9e9bb44e2a89e4f6b699
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 26 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 183 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf