CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Responsible provision of online gambling: Effects, usability and gamblers’ experiences of protective measures implemented in online gambling environments
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Problem gambling is considered a public health problem in many countries and is associated with serious financial and health-related harms for both problem gamblers and significant others. It is possible to create gambling environments that would promote sustainable gambling behaviors and prevent excessive gambling. However, research on the effectiveness of tools for responsible provision of gambling is scarce and the quality of the research is low. Also, there exists a conflict of interest between making a profit when providing gambling and protecting vulnerable customers. The general aim of the project was to study the effects, usability and gamblers’ experiences of tools for responsible provision of online gambling. Study I evaluated the effects of a prompt to set voluntary deposit-limit of optional size among 4,328 customers of an online gambling platform. During the data collection period, all customers from Finland registering an account on the gambling platform were randomized into being prompted to set a deposit-limit either 1) at-registration, 2) before their first deposit, 3) after their first deposit or 4) to an unprompted control group. Gambling intensity, measured with aggregated net loss, was tracked during 90 days after registration. No differences in gambling intensity between the intervention and control groups were found neither on the whole-group level (B (95% CI) =-0.080 (-0.229-0.069), p=.291), nor in the subgroup of the most involved gamblers (B (95% CI) =0.042(-0.359-0.442), p=.838). Study II aimed at predicting gaming freeze (as a proxy parameter for problem gambling) in online gamblers. For the sample of N=2,618 (N=1,309 freezers), a total of 105 predictors were created based on the data tracked by the gambling platform. The analysis was carried out using the machine learning method Random Forest. The predictive accuracy of the model applied to the dataset was 0.615, with a specificity of 0.686 and a sensitivity of 0.543. Study III aimed at investigating non-problem gamblers’ experiences of protective measures. A total of N=10,200 active customers of an online gambling platform were asked to rate their previous experiences of protective tools, their inclination to abandon a gambling service due to perceived overexposure to protective measures and answer questions on their symptoms of problem gambling. N=1,223 responded to the questionnaire, with the majority of the sample being moderate-risk gamblers (38.5%), followed by low-risk gamblers (26.8%), non-problem gamblers (18.9%) and problem gamblers (15.8%). In general, non-problem gamblers were not more disturbed by protective measures than other categories of gamblers. More problem gamblers have previously abandoned a gambling service due to perceived overexposure to protective measures compared to non-problem gamblers (OR(95% CI)= 7.17(3.61-14.23), p<.001). In conclusion, a prompt to set a voluntary deposit-limit of optional size did not appear to be effective in decreasing gambling intensity in online gamblers, indicating the need of evaluating alternative designs. Predicting gaming freezes in the current project resulted in a low accuracy, indicating that gaming freeze is not suitable as a proxy measurement for problem gambling and suggesting the need for collecting subjective data on symptoms of problem gambling. The results of Study III suggest that protective measures can be tested and implemented without the risk of disturbing recreational gamblers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Psychology, Stockholm University , 2020. , p. 74
Keywords [en]
Problem gambling, responsible gambling, responsible provision of gambling, deposit limit, prediction of gambling problems, experiences of responsible gambling tools, attitudes towards responsible gambling tools, online gambling
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-176230ISBN: 978-91-7797-921-0 (print)ISBN: 978-91-7797-922-7 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-176230DiVA, id: diva2:1373426
Public defence
2020-01-13, David Magnussonsalen (U31), Frescati Hagväg 8, Stockholm, 09:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following paper was unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: Manuscript.

Available from: 2019-12-18 Created: 2019-11-27 Last updated: 2019-12-06Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Deposit Limit Prompt in Online Gambling for Reducing Gambling Intensity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Deposit Limit Prompt in Online Gambling for Reducing Gambling Intensity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2019 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 10, article id 639Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Pre-commitment tools – allowing users of gambling services to pre-set a limit for how much money they may spend – are relatively common. However, there exist no clear evidence of their effectiveness in preventing gamblers from spending more money than they otherwise planned. The aim of the study was to compare gambling intensity between users of an online gambling service prompted to set a deposit limit and non-prompted customers, both in the whole sample and among most active users based on the total number of gambling days. Prospective customers of a publicly governed gambling operator from Finland were randomized to receive a prompt to set a voluntary deposit limit of optional size either (1) at registration, (2) before or (3) after their first deposit, or (4) to an unprompted control condition. Data on customers from Finland with online slots as a preferred gambling category (N = 4328) were tracked in the platform for 90 days starting at account registration, gambling intensity being measured with aggregated net loss. The intervention groups did not differ from each other in either proportion of participants with positive net loss or size of positive net loss. The pooled intervention group did not differ from the control group regarding proportion of gamblers with positive net loss (OR = 1.0; p = 0.921) or size of net loss (B = -0.1; p = 0.291). The intervention groups had higher rates of limit-setters compared to the control condition (ORat-registration/pre-deposit/post-deposit = 11.9/9.2/4.1). Customers who have increased/removed a previously set deposit limit had higher net loss than the limit-setters who have not increased/removed their limit (Bat-registration/pre-deposit/post-deposit/control = 0.7/0.6/1.0/1.3), and unprompted limit-setters lost more than unprompted non-setters (B = 1.0). Prompting online gamblers to set a voluntary deposit limit of optional size did not affect subsequent net loss compared to unprompted customers, motivating design and evaluation of alternative pre-commitment tools. Setting a deposit limit without a prompt or increasing/removing a previously set limit may be a marker of gambling problems and may be used to identify customers in need of help.

Keywords
problem gambling, online gambling, responsible gambling, deposit limit, pre-commitment, natural gambling environment, consumer protection
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-167398 (URN)10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00639 (DOI)000462635100001 ()
Available from: 2019-03-28 Created: 2019-03-28 Last updated: 2019-11-27Bibliographically approved
2. Using the Random Forest Algorithm on Customer Gambling Data for Predicting Gambling Freezes in an Online Gambling Platform
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Using the Random Forest Algorithm on Customer Gambling Data for Predicting Gambling Freezes in an Online Gambling Platform
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background. Data on gambling behaviors routinely collected on online gambling platforms can be used to detect individuals at risk of developing or having gambling problems. As only data on gambling activity is available on gambling platforms, it is important to find a proxy measure for gambling problems. Temporarily freezing one or several gambling categories has potential to serve this purpose. Aim. To predict gambling freeze in a sample of active users of an online gambling platform one week before the freeze, based on one week of behavioral data tracked on the platform. Method. N = 105 predictors were created, covering total values, frequencies, variations, and trajectories of monetary and time-related gambling involvement, number and type of games played, point in time when gambling occurred, age, and gender. The random forest algorithm was applied to a sample of N = 2618 gamblers (of which N = 1309 freezers), with the sample divided 70/30 into a training and testing data set. Results. The accuracy of random forest applied to the testing data set was 0.615, with sensitivity of 0.543 and specificity of 0.686. The five most predictive variables were current age, age on registration date, average session length, average sum of winnings per session, and total session length. Discussion. The predictive accuracy of the algorithm in the current study was relatively low, suggesting the need for a more suitable target variable. Also, analyzing data collected during a longer period might be needed to create a tool that could be used to identify at-risk gamblers.

National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-176229 (URN)
Available from: 2019-11-25 Created: 2019-11-25 Last updated: 2019-12-09Bibliographically approved
3. Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
2019 (English)In: Addictive Behaviors Reports, ISSN 2352-8532, E-ISSN 2076-3387, Vol. 9, article id 100161Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Responsible gambling (RG) tools, aiming at helping gamblers to avoid gambling-related harms, are common in online gambling platforms. Gambling industry, policy makers, and researchers have warned that RG tools can potentially disturb recreational gamblers, channeling them to less protective operators. No evidence exists to support these concerns, and they can hinder the development of effective RG tools. The current study aimed to investigate the recreational gamblers' experiences of RG tools.

Methods: A total of 10,200 active customers of an online gambling service were invited to complete an online survey and rate their overall reactions, attitudes, disturbance and irritation towards RG tools, as well as their inclination to abandon a gambling service due to overexposure to RG tools. N = 1223 surveys were completed.

Results: Non-problem gamblers had positive experiences of RG tools. Moderate-risk gamblers had more positive overall reaction and less irritation to previous experiences of RG tools compared to non-problem gamblers. Problem gamblers had least positive attitudes, most disturbance and most irritation towards RG pictures. Non-problem gamblers had lowest rates of having abandoned a service because of perceived overexposure to RG tools (5.2% compared to 25.9% of problem gamblers), with a significant between-group difference (OR [95%CI] = 7.17 [3.61–14.23], p < .001).

Conclusions: Non-problem gamblers were not particularly disturbed by RG tools and were not at risk of abandoning online gambling services because of overexposure to RG tools. The study found no grounds for limiting the design and implementation of RG tools due to fears of disturbing recreational gamblers.

Keywords
recreational gamblers, problem gambling, responsible gambling, attitudes, online gambling, consumer protection
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-171268 (URN)10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100161 (DOI)
Available from: 2019-08-05 Created: 2019-08-05 Last updated: 2019-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Responsible provision of online gambling(4338 kB)32 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4338 kBChecksum SHA-512
b4ca2bc313b014bfeff088fc2ef8197e48773a4b0a37e3b2269e6f80dcb7c15336d2155631f4713785ce954ca07c20509922c745725942a6c9aeefc16b6f682d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ivanova, Ekaterina
By organisation
Department of Psychology
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 32 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 263 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf