Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Overprotective Nose? Implicit Bias Is Positively Related to Individual Differences in Body Odor Disgust Sensitivity
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Perception and psychophysics.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Perception and psychophysics. University of Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6708-1253
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Personality, Social and Developmental Psychology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Personality, Social and Developmental Psychology.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 62020 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 11, article id 301Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Body odors are universal elicitors of disgust, a core emotion that plays a key role in the behavioral immune system (BIS) - a set of psychological functions working to avoid disease. Recent studies showed that body odor disgust sensitivity (BODS) is associated with explicit xenophobia and authoritarianism. In the current experimental pre-registered study (), we investigated the association between olfactory pathogen cues, BODS and implicit bias toward an outgroup (tested by an implicit association test). Results show that BODS is positively related to implicit bias toward an outgroup, suggesting that social attitudes may be linked to basic chemosensory processes. These attitudes were not influenced by background odors. Additionally, BODS was related to social, but not economic conservatism. This study extends the BIS framework to an experimental context by focusing on the role of disgust and body odors in shaping implicit bias.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 11, article id 301
Keywords [en]
olfaction, disgust, implicit bias, behavioral immune system, authoritarianism, body odor disgust sensitivity
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-181069DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00301ISI: 000525283900001PubMedID: 32180752OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-181069DiVA, id: diva2:1427770
Note

This work was supported by research grants from the Swedish Research Council (2016-02018) to MTL, a Pro Futura Scientia VII fellowship and research grants from the Swedish Research Council (421-2012-806) to JO and the Swedish Foundation for the Humanities and Social Sciences (M14-0375:1) to ML.

Available from: 2020-05-01 Created: 2020-05-01 Last updated: 2022-05-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Olfaction and prejudice: The role of body odor disgust sensitivity and disease avoidance in understanding social attitudes
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Olfaction and prejudice: The role of body odor disgust sensitivity and disease avoidance in understanding social attitudes
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Disease avoidance is one of the main roles of olfaction. In particular, body odors are universal elicitors of disgust, a core emotion that plays a key role in disease avoidance. The disease avoidance theoretical framework emphasizes psychological mechanisms – attitudes and behaviors – aiming to recognize and evade pathogen threats. Thus, it focuses on behavioral immune defenses and disgust, which often evokes such attitudes and behaviors. Importantly, the quality of body odors changes with sickness, and thus olfactory disease detection is possible. Body odor disgust sensitivity (BODS) might reflect a behavioral disposition to avoid pathogens, and it may also involve social attitudes that prefer limited contact with strangers. The general aim of this thesis was to investigate the connection between olfaction, (body) odor disgust, and social attitudes from the perspective of disease avoidance.

In Study I, I investigated the relationship between disgust sensitivity to body odors and prejudice. Using an online survey, I found that high levels of BODS were associated with stronger prejudice towards a fictitious refugee group and that this relationship was partially explained by perceiving the group as different in terms of food, hygiene, and sanitary practices. In Study II, I looked at the association between olfactory stimulation, BODS, and implicit bias toward an outgroup. BODS levels were positively related to implicit bias towards an outgroup; however, this bias was not affected by olfactory cues. In Study III, I aimed to see if the relationship between BODS and prejudice generalizes across different cultures and locations. I found that higher BODS levels were associated with more prejudiced attitudes towards a fictitious refugee group across nine countries on all continents. As in Study I, this relationship was partially explained by perceived dissimilarities of the refugees’ norms regarding hygiene and food preparation, and general attitudes toward immigration. In Study IV, I investigated the relationship between the self-reported body odor disgust and perception of real odors, showing that individuals with higher BODS levels perceived smells as more highly valenced overall: unpleasant smells were rated as more unpleasant, and pleasant smells were rated as more pleasant.

Overall, the research presented in this thesis supports the idea that there is a link between olfactory disgust and prejudice, which can be explained by disease avoidance behaviors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 2022. p. 86
Keywords
olfaction, disease avoidance, prejudice, body odors, disgust sensitivity
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-204430 (URN)978-91-7911-932-4 (ISBN)978-91-7911-933-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-08-25, Hörsal 4, Hus 2, Albano, Albanovägen 18 and online via Zoom, public link is available at the department website, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-05-31 Created: 2022-05-05 Last updated: 2022-05-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Zakrzewska, Marta ZuzannaLiuzza, Marco TullioLindholm, TorunBlomkvist, AnnaLarsson, MariaOlofsson, Jonas K.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zakrzewska, Marta ZuzannaLiuzza, Marco TullioLindholm, TorunBlomkvist, AnnaLarsson, MariaOlofsson, Jonas K.
By organisation
Perception and psychophysicsPersonality, Social and Developmental Psychology
In the same journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 238 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf