Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The role of epistemic signalling in transdisciplinary knowledge production: Examples from the field of sustainable water management
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2457-6448
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4714-9449
2020 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The number of arrangements where academia collaborates with governmental and nongovernmental organisations, as well as industries, have increased over the last decades. While research has focused on whether knowledge produced in such collaborations is genuinely influenced by others than the ‘experts’, or those with the highest status and power, this report explores the influence of framings and re-framings of what the participants and society should perceive as the nature of knowledge: epistemology. We analyse the framings of epistemology through the concept ‘epistemic signalling’. Epistemic signalling refers to communication or rule-making that indicates what type(s) of knowledge is considered relevant, valuable or useful in knowledge collaboration. Empirically we draw on two examples of transdisciplinary collaborations in the field of water management (one from the UK and one from the US). In-depth interviews were combined with document analysis.

We have analysed three themes of epistemic signalling that we suggest influence knowledge collaborations. The first one concerns how the form and theme of the collaboration were decided upon and is based on Arnstein’s (1969) ladder of participation. The second refers to what type(s) of participants were considered suitable – as for example experts or lay people. Here we use the framework of aggregate (bargaining-oriented) versus integrative (deliberative) processes of knowledge collaboration in our analysis. The third and last theme concerns what is perceived as valuable and successful in the collaborations, something that we discuss in terms of procedural and epistemic virtues of knowledge collaborations.

The epistemology of organisations and participants in knowledge collaborations ought to be a distinct subject of open discussions from the earliest planning stage and onwards. It is easy to assume that epistemic signalling would be esoteric parts of practical, collaborative knowledge production. To the contrary, open epistemological reflections may help highlight situations where hierarchies turn out to be remains of routines inconsistent with new goals of more profound exchange of practical and scientific knowledge. In such cases, the epistemologies need to be revised to better fit the new goals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE), Stockholm University , 2020. , p. 31
Series
SCORE rapportserie, ISSN 1404-5052 ; 2020:6
Keywords [en]
knowledge, collaboration, water management, epistemic signaling
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-183227ISBN: 978-91-88833-11-2 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-183227DiVA, id: diva2:1447849
Funder
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, FSK15-1081:1Available from: 2020-06-26 Created: 2020-06-26 Last updated: 2022-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(549 kB)53 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 549 kBChecksum SHA-512
1157c64d78dc520bb4535278fecc0251575dbb99d4dd7bc0f9de7b3c8e49401d9cf4fc9bcca70646cbd8c2ee4bfa5680d08e47559e5cd7000d6b772db71ff144
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Grafström, MariaJonsson, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grafström, MariaJonsson, Anna
By organisation
Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE)
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 53 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf