Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A-learning: A new formulation of associative learning theory
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies. CUNY, USA.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.
Number of Authors: 32020 (English)In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, ISSN 1069-9384, E-ISSN 1531-5320, Vol. 27, p. 1166-1194Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We present a new mathematical formulation of associative learning focused on non-human animals, which we call A-learning. Building on current animal learning theory and machine learning, A-learning is composed of two learning equations, one for stimulus-response values and one for stimulus values (conditioned reinforcement). A third equation implements decision-making by mapping stimulus-response values to response probabilities. We show that A-learning can reproduce the main features of: instrumental acquisition, including the effects of signaled and unsignaled non-contingent reinforcement; Pavlovian acquisition, including higher-order conditioning, omission training, autoshaping, and differences in form between conditioned and unconditioned responses; acquisition of avoidance responses; acquisition and extinction of instrumental chains and Pavlovian higher-order conditioning; Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer; Pavlovian and instrumental outcome revaluation effects, including insight into why these effects vary greatly with training procedures and with the proximity of a response to the reinforcer. We discuss the differences between current theory and A-learning, such as its lack of stimulus-stimulus and response-stimulus associations, and compare A-learning with other temporal-difference models from machine learning, such as Q-learning, SARSA, and the actor-critic model. We conclude that A-learning may offer a more convenient view of associative learning than current mathematical models, and point out areas that need further development.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 27, p. 1166-1194
Keywords [en]
Associative learning, Pavlovian conditioning, Instrumental conditioning, Mathematical model, Conditioned reinforcement, Outcome revaluation
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184517DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01749-0ISI: 000546728300002PubMedID: 32632888OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-184517DiVA, id: diva2:1503195
Available from: 2020-11-23 Created: 2020-11-23 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Ghirlanda, StefanoLind, JohanEnquist, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ghirlanda, StefanoLind, JohanEnquist, Magnus
By organisation
Department of Archaeology and Classical StudiesDepartment of Zoology
In the same journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf