Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Clinical psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2172-8813
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52022 (English)In: BMC Psychiatry, E-ISSN 1471-244X, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 16Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Despite the association of Gambling Disorder (GD) with poor mental health, treatment options generally lack components targeting emotional difficulties. This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of adding strategies of emotion regulation to an eight-session weekly group treatment.

Method: This non-randomized pilot study recruited 21 treatment-seeking adults with GD, (mean age = 36.3, 19% females) from addiction care. In a mixed methods design, measures of within-group changes in self-reported symptoms of GD were complemented with thematic analysis of post-treatment interviews regarding the feasibility of the treatment.

Results: Within-group scores on the Gambling Symptoms Assessment Scale (G-SAS) showed a 47% decrease (β: -0.1599, 95% CI: − 0.2526 to − 0.0500) from pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up, with Hedges’ g = 1.07 (CI: 0.57–1.60).

The number of GD-symptoms according to the Structured Clinical Interview for Gambling Disorder (SCI-GD) decreased from 7.0 (SD = 1.60) at pre-treatment to 2.1 (SD = 2.36) at 12-month follow-up. Participants completed an average of 6.3 sessions and rated the intervention high in satisfaction and acceptability. Feasibility interviews showed no noticeable negative effects or ethical issues. Furthermore, helpful components in the treatment were: increased awareness of emotional processes and strategies to deal with difficult emotions.

Conclusions: Adding emotion regulation strategies in the treatment of GD is feasible and acceptable and warrants further investigation in a controlled trial.

Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03725735).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 16
Keywords [en]
gambling disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, emotion regulation, pilot trial, mixed methods
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-201151DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03630-3ISI: 000739949600002PubMedID: 34991511Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85122518236OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-201151DiVA, id: diva2:1630000
Note

For correction see: Correction: Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial, DOI 10.1186/s12888-021-03630-3.

Available from: 2022-01-19 Created: 2022-01-19 Last updated: 2024-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Månsson, ViktorMolander, OlofCarlbring, PerRosendahl, IngvarBerman, Anne H.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Månsson, ViktorMolander, OlofCarlbring, PerRosendahl, IngvarBerman, Anne H.
By organisation
Clinical psychology
In the same journal
BMC Psychiatry
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf