Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Academia and society in collaborative knowledge production towards urban sustainability: several schemes—three common crossroads
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Lund University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4714-9449
Number of Authors: 42022 (English)In: Environment, Development and Sustainability, ISSN 1387-585X, E-ISSN 1573-2975Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Arrangements for collaboration in knowledge production across academia, government, non-governmental organisations, and corporations have several names, such as citizen-science, community-based participatory research, engaged research and hybrid forums. The multiplicity of schemes does not lie only in the high number of names for various versions of collaborative knowledge production. Different scholars also use concepts in multiple ways, depending on their individual choices, mother disciplines, and the problem area in which collaboration occurs. At the same time, there is a lack of analytical tools that address the full range of collaborative research schemes and provide a systematic set of questions to learn about the schemes, challenges, and opportunities. Based on our review of academic journal articles highlighting collaborative research schemes, this paper aims to analyse three parameters which it is fair to say that virtually all arrangements of collaborative knowledge production ought to consider when making decisions, parameters that are often partially missed or misunderstood: (A) epistemic-procedural, (B) exclusive-inclusive and (C) aggregative-integrative. By examining the three parameters, their political theory origins, and how they connect to and challenge existing schemes of knowledge collaboration, we provide analytical tools that could facilitate processes of developing and scrutinising arrangements of collaborative research. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022.
Keywords [en]
Urban sustainability, Transdisciplinary science, Learning, Citizen-science, Community-based participatory research, Engaged research, Hybrid forums, Collaborative research, Literature review
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-207925DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02564-4ISI: 000832548000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85135262271OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-207925DiVA, id: diva2:1689186
Available from: 2022-08-22 Created: 2022-08-22 Last updated: 2023-08-14

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jonsson, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jonsson, Anna
By organisation
Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE)
In the same journal
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf