Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Academia and society in collaborative knowledge production towards urban sustainability: several schemes—three common crossroads
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Socialantropologiska institutionen, Stockholms centrum för forskning om offentlig sektor (SCORE). Lund University, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-4714-9449
Rekke forfattare: 42022 (engelsk)Inngår i: Environment, Development and Sustainability, ISSN 1387-585X, E-ISSN 1573-2975Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Arrangements for collaboration in knowledge production across academia, government, non-governmental organisations, and corporations have several names, such as citizen-science, community-based participatory research, engaged research and hybrid forums. The multiplicity of schemes does not lie only in the high number of names for various versions of collaborative knowledge production. Different scholars also use concepts in multiple ways, depending on their individual choices, mother disciplines, and the problem area in which collaboration occurs. At the same time, there is a lack of analytical tools that address the full range of collaborative research schemes and provide a systematic set of questions to learn about the schemes, challenges, and opportunities. Based on our review of academic journal articles highlighting collaborative research schemes, this paper aims to analyse three parameters which it is fair to say that virtually all arrangements of collaborative knowledge production ought to consider when making decisions, parameters that are often partially missed or misunderstood: (A) epistemic-procedural, (B) exclusive-inclusive and (C) aggregative-integrative. By examining the three parameters, their political theory origins, and how they connect to and challenge existing schemes of knowledge collaboration, we provide analytical tools that could facilitate processes of developing and scrutinising arrangements of collaborative research. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2022.
Emneord [en]
Urban sustainability, Transdisciplinary science, Learning, Citizen-science, Community-based participatory research, Engaged research, Hybrid forums, Collaborative research, Literature review
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-207925DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02564-4ISI: 000832548000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85135262271OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-207925DiVA, id: diva2:1689186
Tilgjengelig fra: 2022-08-22 Laget: 2022-08-22 Sist oppdatert: 2023-08-14

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Jonsson, Anna

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Jonsson, Anna
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Environment, Development and Sustainability

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 25 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf