Attachment in older adults is stably associated with health and quality of life: findings from a 14-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study
Number of Authors: 32023 (English)In: Aging & Mental Health, ISSN 1360-7863, E-ISSN 1364-6915, Vol. 27, no 9, p. 1832-1842Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objectives: Secure adult attachment may promote health and well-being in old age, yet is understudied in this life phase. Consequently, we aim to examine associations between adult attachment and mental and physical health and quality of life, both concurrently and longitudinally.
Methods: We used three phases of the Whitehall II study (n = 5,222 to 6,713). Adult attachment was measured with the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ) at 48–68 years. Mental and physical health was measured concurrently and 14 years later; quality of life was measured five years later. We used linear regressions to examine associations, controlling for age, gender and education.
Results: Almost half, 46% of participants, were classified as secure, 13% as preoccupied, 34% as dismissing and 7% as fearful. Adult attachment was associated with mental and physical health, concurrently and 14 years later, and with quality of life five years later. Preoccupied and fearful participants had poorest mental health and quality of life; dismissing participants held an intermediate position. Insecurely attached participants tended to report poorer physical health.
Conclusions: Adult attachment has enduring associations with mental and physical health, which suggests that the construct of adult attachment itself is stable in this phase of the life course.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2023. Vol. 27, no 9, p. 1832-1842
Keywords [en]
morbidity, attachment-related bonds, middle age, aging
National Category
Gerontology, specialising in Medical and Health Sciences Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-211796DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2148157ISI: 000890057600001PubMedID: 36420713Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85142492620OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-211796DiVA, id: diva2:1713729
Note
This work was supported by the Kamprad Family Foundation under Grant 20180313 to LGP; and The Ryoichi Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund to MF.
2022-11-272022-11-272024-01-13Bibliographically approved