Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A methodology to analyze students' intertwined speech and drawings—Aesthetic experiences in science education
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Teaching and Learning.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0905-7439
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Teaching and Learning.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2164-1291
Number of Authors: 22024 (English)In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, ISSN 0022-4308, E-ISSN 1098-2736, Vol. 61, no 10, p. 2444-2467Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to introduce a methodology for analyzing the complex configurations emerging in students' speech and drawing activities, having consequences for how and what students learn and make meaning of in science. Accordingly, we launch a methodology to unfold the multidimensional communication as to deepen the analysis of the science epistemic discourse. We present an empirical account of students' explorations through different signs to demonstrate the construction of the methodology step-by-step. This methodology, a “seven-concept-assemblage,” is rooted in Dewey's pragmatism and Deleuze's experimentalism broadening teachers' and researchers' possibility to target students' science explorations and meaning-making crosscutting different domains. The methodology diminishes the risk of interpretation when grasping unspoken messages and meanings. Empirical data were collected in an elementary school exemplifying the methodology and consist of audio recordings, photographs, fieldnotes, and students' drawings. The result reveals that the methodology in use exposed what and how students explored and learned cognitively and aesthetically. Imagination fertilized the process throughout. Learning then is suggested as a transductive meaning-making process shaped through oral and pictorial relations—always from a purpose.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 61, no 10, p. 2444-2467
Keywords [en]
aesthetic experience, drawing and talking intertwined, methodology, pragmatism
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-231153DOI: 10.1002/tea.21966ISI: 001239321900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85195423850OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-231153DiVA, id: diva2:1877219
Available from: 2024-06-25 Created: 2024-06-25 Last updated: 2025-02-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Caiman, CeciliaJakobson, Britt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Caiman, CeciliaJakobson, Britt
By organisation
Department of Teaching and Learning
In the same journal
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf