Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Introducing listening as a weak method for advancing sustainability and interdisciplinary scholarship
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. University of Helsinki, Finland; North-West University, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2716-5502
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Urban Systems Lab, The New School, USA; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9499-0791
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 82025 (English)In: Sustainability Science, ISSN 1862-4065, E-ISSN 1862-4057, Vol. 20, p. 77-94Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is now widespread recognition of the need for inter/transdisciplinary (I/TD) approaches to solving global problems like climate change and biodiversity. Yet methods for successfully integrating knowledge across disciplines, and between research and practice, are in need of further development, particularly approaches that can ameliorate epistemological and ontological divides. Here we propose a framework for good listening as a ‘weak method’ that can provide guidance and structure to I/TD collaborations, but does not assume the form and goals a given collaboration will take. Synthesising the results of a scoping, interdisciplinary literature review, we highlight four key components of listening—receiving, processing, interpretation, and feedback/response—and provide a set of normative values regarding ‘good listening’ for each. Our goal is to provide a framework that is grounded in detailed scholarly discussions of listening politics and practice, but that is specifically formulated in response to the needs and concerns of I/TD researchers. We then apply our framework to four commonly encountered challenges in sustainability science, drawing on our collective experience in the field to explore how good listening can aid I/TD collaboration in regards to inclusion, group dynamics, format and pace. In doing so, we hope to inspire those working in sustainability science to approach I/TD collaboration in a new way and provide a tool for facilitating caring and transformational approaches to solving the world’s most pressing sustainability crises.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 20, p. 77-94
Keywords [en]
Co-production, Collaboration, Convergence, Inclusion, Integration, Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary practice
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-238767DOI: 10.1007/s11625-024-01571-wScopus ID: 2-s2.0-85207351880OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-238767DiVA, id: diva2:1933819
Available from: 2025-02-02 Created: 2025-02-02 Last updated: 2025-02-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Branny, ArturAndersson, ErikMcPhearson, Timon

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Branny, ArturAndersson, ErikMcPhearson, Timon
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Sustainability Science
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf