Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Critical review on in silico methods for structural annotation of chemicals detected with LC/HRMS non-targeted screening
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).ORCID iD: 0009-0002-0169-2363
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5497-5522
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 62025 (English)In: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, ISSN 1618-2642, E-ISSN 1618-2650, Vol. 417, no 3, p. 473-493Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Non-targeted screening with liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) is increasingly leveraging in silico methods, including machine learning, to obtain candidate structures for structural annotation of LC/HRMS features and their further prioritization. Candidate structures are commonly retrieved based on the tandem mass spectral information either from spectral or structural databases; however, the vast majority of the detected LC/HRMS features remain unannotated, constituting what we refer to as a part of the unknown chemical space. Recently, the exploration of this chemical space has become accessible through generative models. Furthermore, the evaluation of the candidate structures benefits from the complementary empirical analytical information such as retention time, collision cross section values, and ionization type. In this critical review, we provide an overview of the current approaches for retrieving and prioritizing candidate structures. These approaches come with their own set of advantages and limitations, as we showcase in the example of structural annotation of ten known and ten unknown LC/HRMS features. We emphasize that these limitations stem from both experimental and computational considerations. Finally, we highlight three key considerations for the future development of in silico methods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 417, no 3, p. 473-493
Keywords [en]
Generative modeling, Machine learning, Non-targeted analysis, Non-targeted screening, Suspect screening, Untargeted screening
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-239112DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05471-xISI: 001290127000002PubMedID: 39138659Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85203470144OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-239112DiVA, id: diva2:1935138
Available from: 2025-02-06 Created: 2025-02-06 Last updated: 2025-02-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hupatz, HenrikRahu, IdaWang, Wei-ChiehKruve, Anneli

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hupatz, HenrikRahu, IdaWang, Wei-ChiehKruve, Anneli
By organisation
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK)Department of Environmental Science
In the same journal
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf