Translocations are carried out either unintentionally or intentionally for conservation or management reasons. In both cases, translocated populations may genetically impact natural populations via introgression. Understanding how genetic background may affect an establishment in a novel environment and the potential risks for native populations is important for biodiversity conservation. Here, using a panel of 96 SNPs, we monitor the establishment of two genetically and ecologically distinct brown trout populations released into a mountain lake system in central Sweden where trout did not occur prior to the release. The release was carried out in 1979, and we monitor the establishment over the first three decades (5–6 generations) in seven lakes downstream of the release site. We find that extensive hybridization has occurred, and genes from both populations exist in all lakes examined. Genes from the population that was nonmigratory in its native environment have remained to a higher degree in the area close to the release site, while genes from the population that was more migratory in its native habitat have spread further downstream. All established populations exhibit higher levels of genetic diversity than the released populations. Natural, stream-resident brown trout populations occur ~15 km downstream of the release site and below a waterfall that acts as an upstream migration barrier. Released fish have spread genes to these populations but with low introgression rates of 3%–8%. Recently adopted indicators for monitoring genetic diversity were partly able to detect this introgression, emphasizing the usefulness of genetic indicators in management. The SNP panel used in this study provides a similar picture as previously used allozymes, showing that older marker systems with fewer loci may still be useful for describing the population structure.