Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Microessentialism: What is the Argument?
Stockholms universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Filosofiska institutionen.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-9771-3469
2011 (Engelska)Ingår i: Noûs, ISSN 0029-4624, E-ISSN 1468-0068, Vol. 45, nr 1, s. 1-21Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

According to microessentialism, it is necessary to resort to microstructure in order to adequately characterise chemical substances such as water. But the thesis has never been properly supported by argument. Kripke and Putnam, who originally proposed the thesis, suggest that a so-called stereotypical characterisation is not possible, whereas one in terms of microstructure is. However, the sketchy outlines given of stereotypical descriptions hardly support the impossibility claim. On the other hand, what naturally stands in contrast to microscopic description is description in macroscopic terms, and macroscopic characterisations of water are certainly possible. This suffices to counter the claim that microdescriptions are necessary. Whether it counters the impossibility claim depends on whether all macroscopic descriptions are stereotypical (stereotypical descriptions presumably being macroscopic). In so far as systematic import of “stereotypical” can be determined, it would seem not. But some macroscopic characterisations have definite affinity with everyday knowledge, which presumably stands in conflict with the spirit of the impossibility claim. Since what is characterised are properties expressed by predicates like “is water”, the necessity of identity has no bearing here, and matters of interpretation pose problems for claims to the effect that science fixes the extension of “water” as ordinarily understood.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2011. Vol. 45, nr 1, s. 1-21
Nyckelord [en]
Kripke, Putnam, micrsessentialism, natural kinds, water
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Forskningsämne
teoretisk filosofi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-39489DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00756.xISI: 000287526900001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-39489DiVA, id: diva2:320535
Tillgänglig från: 2010-05-25 Skapad: 2010-05-25 Senast uppdaterad: 2022-02-24Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Person

Needham, Paul

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Needham, Paul
Av organisationen
Filosofiska institutionen
I samma tidskrift
Noûs
Filosofi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 118 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf