Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why did the Telia-Telenor merger fail?
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Management & Organisation.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-6668-1190
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Företagsekonomiska institutionen.
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Företagsekonomiska institutionen.
2004 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Business Review, ISSN 0969-5931, E-ISSN 1873-6149, Vol. 13, nr 5, s. 573-594Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to examine through a case study of the merger of Telia–Telenor why firms from apparently similar national cultures can fail to form a co-operative venture. Telia and Telenor were the largest telecom operators in Sweden and Norway, respectively. Both were government-owned with a strong monopoly over their respective national markets for a long time. Despite perceived similarities between the negotiating parties in national culture, corporate practice, and language, the negotiation eventually went askew and the ongoing merger ended in December 1999 after only two months in existence. We describe the process of the Telia–Telenor merger negotiation and analyze it from a cross-cultural management perspective. Our major finding is that historical sentiments, feelings and emotions, if not handled well, can cause fatal damage to cross-cultural business ventures.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2004. Vol. 13, nr 5, s. 573-594
Nyckelord [en]
Telia, Telenor, Merger negotiation, History, Culture
Nationell ämneskategori
Företagsekonomi
Forskningsämne
företagsekonomi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-56390DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.06.002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-56390DiVA, id: diva2:410926
Anmärkning

Corrigendum: doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.09.006

The authors intend to announce the following: Norway had been a province of Denmark but not Sweden and the Norwegian Constitution was adopted on May 17, 1814. Detailed description of the Sweden–Norway Union (1814–1905) can be sourced via a recent project conducted jointly by Swedish and Norwegian researchers http://www.nb.no/baser/1905

Tillgänglig från: 2011-04-15 Skapad: 2011-04-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2022-02-24Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Person

Fang, Tony

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Fang, Tony
Av organisationen
Management & OrganisationFöretagsekonomiska institutionen
I samma tidskrift
International Business Review
Företagsekonomi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 537 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf