Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Co-management in Latin American small-scale shellfisheries: assessment from long-term case studies
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
Antal upphovsmän: 72016 (Engelska)Ingår i: Fish and Fisheries, ISSN 1467-2960, E-ISSN 1467-2979, Vol. 17, nr 1, s. 176-192Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Co-management (Co-M), defined as the sharing of management tasks and responsibilities between governments and local users, is emerging as a powerful institutional arrangement to redress fisheries paradigm failures, yet long-term assessments of its performance are lacking. A comparative analysis of five small-scale Latin American shellfisheries was conducted to identify factors suggesting success and failure. In Chile, Uruguay and Mexico Co-M produced positive effects, including stabilization of landings at low levels, increase in abundance, CPUE, unit prices and revenues per unit of effort, and reduced interannual variability in several fishery indicators, particularly in landings. Co-M was successful because it was mainly bottom-up implemented and accompanied by-catch shares (spatial property rights and community quotas). By contrast, Co-M implementation was unable to prevent the collapse of the Galapagos sea cucumber fishery, as reflected by a decrease in abundance and CPUE. Negative effects were also observed in the Galapagos spiny lobster fishery during Co-M implementation. However, recovery was observed in recent years, reflected in a stabilization of fishing effort and the highest CPUE and economic revenues observed since the beginning of the Co-M implementation phase. The combined effects of market forces, climate variability and a moratorium on fishing effort were critical in fishery recovery. We conclude that Co-M is not a blueprint that can be applied to all shellfisheries to enhance their governability. These social-ecological systems need to be managed by jointly addressing problems related to the resources, their marine environment and the people targeting them, accounting for their socioeconomic and cultural contexts.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2016. Vol. 17, nr 1, s. 176-192
Nyckelord [en]
Co-management, fishery indicators, Latin America, small-scale shellfisheries, social-ecological systems
Nationell ämneskategori
Biologiska vetenskaper Lantbruksvetenskap, skogsbruk och fiske
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-128513DOI: 10.1111/faf.12101ISI: 000371240900009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-128513DiVA, id: diva2:917361
Tillgänglig från: 2016-04-06 Skapad: 2016-03-30 Senast uppdaterad: 2022-02-23Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Person

Folke, Carl

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Folke, Carl
Av organisationen
Stockholm Resilience Centre
I samma tidskrift
Fish and Fisheries
Biologiska vetenskaperLantbruksvetenskap, skogsbruk och fiske

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 118 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf