Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The concept of integrated services in different welfare states from a life course perspective
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4571-9399
2016 (English)In: International Social Security Review, ISSN 0020-871X, E-ISSN 1468-246X, Vol. 69, no 3-4, 85-107 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The concept of integrated services is a common feature of current social policy discussions. It is often argued that social support systems have not evolved to cope with the complexity of individuals’ needs. This is deemed true for a variety of interrelated difficulties that cut across traditional welfare programmes and life course lines. This article examines the efforts of integrated services to bridge policy areas such as social policy, labour market policy and health care services for four different vulnerable groups at major stages of the life course: childhood, youth, adulthood and old age. Analytically, the article adopts a framework developed by Valentijn et al. (2013) that allows systematic comparisons. Using mainly high-income economy examples, the article connects key features of a certain policy area with key elements of integrated services. Key features of a policy area direct attention to the function of the policy area, and these are expressed through the framework of “person-focused” and “population-focused” services. Key elements of integrated services in turn emphasize levels of integration (macro, meso, micro). Central questions addressed are the character of integration efforts for vulnerable groups at different stages of the life cycle and how variations therein can be understood. As a complement, sociological explanations of individual vulnerability, which are separated by causes of vulnerability into basic, conditional and triggering factors, are also used. A main finding is that the life course perspective as such does not explain variation in integration efforts; rather, it is the institutional features of the specific policy areas. These constrain or promote the potential for greater integration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 69, no 3-4, 85-107 p.
Keyword [en]
social security planning, client oriented approach, OECD, international
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-137092DOI: 10.1111/issr.12113ISI: 000391032200006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-137092DiVA: diva2:1059660
Available from: 2016-12-22 Created: 2016-12-22 Last updated: 2017-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Minas, Renate
By organisation
Department of Social Work
In the same journal
International Social Security Review
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 70 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf