Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
En defensa de la contrastividad en la enseñanza de segundas lenguas
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3235-8560
2016 (Spanish)In: Decires, ISSN ISSN 1405-9134, Vol. 16, no 20, 21-48 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [es]

Tras décadas de predominio de una ideología que proscribe el uso de la lengua de base en la enseñanza de lenguasextranjeras y reduce la posibilidad de aplicarle un enfoque contrastivo,se reanima hoy día el debate sobre las ventajas y desventajas de una yotra orientación pedagógica. La presente contribución contempla daruna visión de conjunto sobre el campo y abogar por un uso juicioso de la lengua de base así como también por la aplicación de una perspectiva contrastiva, no solo en la clase de lengua extranjera sino también en otros contextos, como el aicle, la clase de lengua segundaen su comunidad meta, o la enseñanza de lenguas de herencia.

Abstract [en]

After several decades in which the prevailing ideologyregarding language use in the foreign language classroom has been toproscribe the use of the L1, a posture which has practically eliminatedthe possibility of applying a contrastive approach, a new debate hasarisen about the pros and cons of the two opposing pedagogies. Thiscontribution aims at presenting an overview of the field as well asgiving strong arguments in favor of both a judicious use of the L1 anda contrastive approach in foreign and second language teaching. Itis argued that this approach is relevant not only to the FL classroombut also to other contexts such as clil education, sl classes and theteaching of heritage languages

Abstract [fr]

Depuis plusieurs décennies de dominance d’uneidéologie qui bannit l’usage de la l1 dans l’enseignement des languesétrangères et réduit les possibilités d’application d’une approchecontrastive, le débat ressurgit sur les avantages et désavantages desdeux pédagogies opposées. L’objectif de la contribution présente estde donner une vue d’ensemble sur ce champ ainsi que de présenterdes arguments convaincants non seulement en appui d’un recoursjudicieux à la l1, mais aussi en défense de l’approche contrastive,dans la classe de langues. Il est soutenu qu’une telle approche pourraêtre appliquée non seulement à la classe le traditionnelle mais aussià des contextes tels que l’enseignement emile, les classes de languessecondes offertes dans la communauté cible et l’enseignement deslangues-patrimoine.*

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 16, no 20, 21-48 p.
Keyword [en]
access to L1 in foreign and second language teaching, contrastive approach in foreign and heritage language teaching and in CLIL classes
National Category
Humanities
Research subject
Language Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-137167OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-137167DiVA: diva2:1060680
Available from: 2016-12-29 Created: 2016-12-29 Last updated: 2017-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(194 kB)5 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 194 kBChecksum SHA-512
8d6e41664c1e5a1c8a1b7393e32f63ac5c830089a4f48df428ba0e562b23aca0201e3086e9052ce9a8a06ebf720bf79d08734b6181d1170b2e8a4b4821f5597e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fant, Lars
By organisation
Department of Romance Studies and Classics
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 51 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link