Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Disentangling associational effects: both resource density and resource frequency affect search behaviour in complex environments
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.
Number of Authors: 4
2016 (English)In: Functional Ecology, ISSN 0269-8463, E-ISSN 1365-2435, Vol. 30, no 11, 1826-1833 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Neighbouring resources have been found to either decrease or increase the likelihood that a consumer organism attacks a focal resource. These phenomena are referred to as associational resistance (AR) and associational susceptibility (AS), respectively. While associational effects have been observed in various field studies, little is known on how resource heterogeneity can cause associational effects. We used a laboratory approach in which we studied the effects of resource density and frequency in the search behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for olfactory-guided behaviour in insects. We first determined whether D.melanogaster could discriminate between odour sources that differ quantitatively. Secondly, we determined what the effect of resource density and frequency was on the search behaviour of D.melanogaster by combining these resources into various patch arrangements. Finally, we used the outcome of our experiments to disentangle the role of resource density and frequency in associational effects. We found that D.melanogaster has the ability to discriminate between quantitatively different resources, but that the attraction to resource density is constrained by an optimum after which attraction decreases. Furthermore, in heterogeneous environments, flies showed a strong preference towards the more apparent resource, leading to AS for the more apparent resources and AR for the less apparent resource. The strength of this interaction increased with a decreasing frequency of the more apparent resource. These results imply that D.melanogaster mainly selects patches at the level of individual resources. Consequently, when a patch contains qualitatively different resources, the more apparent resource will attract a higher number of flies than the less apparent resource irrespective of the frequency of the apparent resource within the patch. Our study shows that associational effects can be explained by determining the hierarchical level at which a consumer selects its resources. When a consumer selects resources at the individual level rather than at the patch level, our results can be used to explain the population dynamics of host plants and their associated consumers under field conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 30, no 11, 1826-1833 p.
Keyword [en]
associational effects, attraction behaviour, complex environments, Drosophila melanogaster, frequency dependence, insect olfaction, neighbourhood effects, wind tunnel
National Category
Biological Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-136924DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12670ISI: 000387362600010OAI: diva2:1061671
Available from: 2017-01-03 Created: 2016-12-19 Last updated: 2017-01-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Verschut, Thomas A.Hambäck, Peter A.
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Functional Ecology
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 2 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link