Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Governance and management dynamics of landscape restoration at multiple scales: Learning from successful environmental managers in Sweden
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2325-1609
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography.
2017 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 197, p. 24-40Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Due to a long history of intensive land and water use, habitat networks for biodiversity conservation are generally degraded in Sweden. Landscape restoration (LR) is an important strategy for achieving representative and functional green infrastructures. However, outcomes of LR efforts are poorly studied, particularly the dynamics of LR governance and management. We apply systems thinking methods to a series of LR case studies to analyse the causal structures underlying LR governance and management in Sweden. We show that these structures appear to comprise of an interlinked system of at least three sets of drivers and four core processes. This system exhibits many characteristics of a transformative change towards an integrated, adaptive approach to governance and management. Key challenges for Swedish LR projects relate to institutional and regulatory flexibility, the timely availability of sufficient funds, and the management of learning and knowledge production processes. In response, successful project leaders develop several key strategies to manage complexity and risk, and enhance perceptions of the attractiveness of LR projects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 197, p. 24-40
Keywords [en]
Landscape restoration, Environmental system dynamics, Integrated adaptive governance & management, Causal loop modelling, Green infrastructure
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Physical Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-140797DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.019ISI: 000401880100003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-140797DiVA, id: diva2:1082507
Available from: 2017-03-16 Created: 2017-03-16 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Unravelling Sustainability: The complex dynamics of emergent environmental governance and management systems at multiple scales
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Unravelling Sustainability: The complex dynamics of emergent environmental governance and management systems at multiple scales
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis adopts a complex systems approach to investigate the dynamic emergence of sustainable environmental governance and management systems in multiple contexts in Europe. Accelerating rates of environmental degradation across the world have called the legitimacy of previous environmental governance and management arrangements into question. Top-down, linear optimisation approaches have failed to account for the inherent complexity of social-ecological systems, upon which human society is entirely reliant for long-term survival. Systemic interdependence between ecological and human systems underscores the “wicked” nature of environmental problems, which are characterised by multi-dimensional values and competing interests among stakeholders and actors at multiple levels and across divergent spatial and temporal scales. Sustainability objectives therefore mandate the evolution of new environmental governance and management systems that are capable of engaging with complexity and dynamism. Employing a methodology based on comprehensive literature assessment, case studies and qualitative systems modelling methods, this thesis clearly identifies the structurally complex systems within which studied environmental governance and management arrangements took place. However, the degree to which these systems indicated the emergence of integrated and/or adaptive approaches, proposed by recent sustainability theories, was more uneven across governance levels and contexts. Key constraints related to the continued dominance of top-down institutional and regulatory frameworks, the availability of adequate inputs (primarily financial) for new approaches and initiatives, socio-cultural influences, and to the complexity and concomitant uncertainty of social-ecological system dynamics. Identified opportunities from across cases related to supra-national institutions, a shift of value preferences amongst stakeholders, and the perverse opportunities arising from chronic environmental degradation and/or acute social/ecological crises. Strategies enabling emergent governance and management approaches included strengthening the legitimacy of new actors, actively managing and integrating the perceptions of stakeholders, learning by doing and sharing, and recruiting and enabling active, hybridised leadership. Importantly, key constraints and opportunities remain largely out of reach for actors and stakeholders at lower levels. Feedback mechanisms by which bottom-up initiatives can influence higher level institutional development are lacking, poorly understood, or are dominated by long delays. These dynamics impede sustainability transitions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, 2019. p. 98
Series
Dissertations in Physical Geography, ISSN 2003-2358 ; 1
Keywords
Integrated adaptive environmental governance and management, Social-ecological system dynamics, Complex systems, Sustainability transitions, Sustainability strategies, Multi-level governance, Causal loop diagrams, Green Infrastructure, Landscape restoration, Habitat restoration, Biodiversity conservation, Comprehensive planning, Stakeholder participation, System thinking, Water Framework Directive, Sustainable water governance, Collaborative learning, Communities of practice, Knowledge management
National Category
Physical Geography Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Physical Geography
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-167024 (URN)978-91-7797-666-0 (ISBN)978-91-7797-667-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2019-05-29, William-Olssonsalen, Geovetenskapens hus, Svante Arrhenius väg 14, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2011-1737
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following paper was unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 4: Manuscript.

Available from: 2019-05-06 Created: 2019-03-29 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Dawson, Lucas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dawson, Lucas
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 261 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf