Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Global Governance Dimensions of Globally Networked Risks: The State of the Art in Social Science Research
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 7
2017 (English)In: Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, ISSN 1944-4079, E-ISSN 1944-4079, Vol. 8, no 1, 4-27 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Global risks are now increasingly being perceived as networked, and likely to result in large-scale, propagating failures and crises that transgress national boundaries and societal sectors. These so called globally networked risks pose fundamental challenges to global governance institutions. A growing literature explores the nature of these globally networked or systemic risks. While this research has taught us much about the anatomy of these risks, it has consistently failed to integrate insights from the wider social sciences. This is problematic since the prescriptions that result from these efforts flow from naive assumptions about the way real-world state and non-state actors behave in the international arena. This leaves serious gaps in our understanding of whether networked environmental risks at all can be governed. The following essay brings together decades of research by different disciplines in the social sciences, and identifies five multi-disciplinary key insights that can inform global approaches to governing these. These insights include the influence of international institutions; the dynamics and effect of international norms and legal mechanisms; the need for international institutions to cope with transboundary and cross-sectoral crises; the role of innovation as a strategy to handle unpredictable global risks; and the necessity to address legitimacy issues.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 8, no 1, 4-27 p.
Keyword [en]
globally networked risks, systemic risks, global environmental governance
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-142691DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12108ISI: 000398844200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-142691DiVA: diva2:1093886
Available from: 2017-05-08 Created: 2017-05-08 Last updated: 2017-05-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Galaz, VictorTallberg, JonasItuarte-Lima, ClaudiaOlsson, Per
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience CentreDepartment of Political Science
In the same journal
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf