Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Gray Zone: Questionable Research Practices in the Business School
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School.
Number of Authors: 3
2017 (English)In: Academy of Management Learning & Education, ISSN 1537-260X, E-ISSN 1944-9585, Vol. 16, no 1, 94-109 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In recent years, the awareness of academic misconduct has increased due to high-profile scandals involving prominent researchers and a spike in journal retractions. But such examples of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (FFP) serve to obscure the less flagrant, more subtle cases of possible misconduct: what some have called questionable research practices (QRPs). Where FFP is seen as inherently negative, QRPs fall into an ethical gray zone between permissible and impermissible. We draw on semistructured interviews with business school scholars to explore the occurrence of QRPs. Prevalent QRPs include playing with numbers, playing with models, and playing with hypotheses. Scholars explain the existence of QRPs in three ways: the inadequate training of researchers, the pressures and incentives to publish in certain outlets, and the demands and expectations of journal editors and reviewers. We argue that a paradox is at work here: To live up to the positivist image of pure science that appears in academic journals, researchers may find themselves-ironically-transgressing this very ideal. Ultimately, this challenges the individualistic account of academic misconduct by drawing attention to the role played by institutional actors, such as academic journals, in encouraging forms of QRPs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 16, no 1, 94-109 p.
National Category
Educational Sciences Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-142686DOI: 10.5465/amle.2015.0201ISI: 000398905600007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-142686DiVA: diva2:1093896
Available from: 2017-05-08 Created: 2017-05-08 Last updated: 2017-05-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Butler, Nick
By organisation
Stockholm Business School
In the same journal
Academy of Management Learning & Education
Educational SciencesEconomics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf