Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Who benefits from visual illustrations in psychology teaching: A question of learning style or not?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Teaching and Learning in the Social Sciences (CeSam).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8026-0050
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4280-4301
2015 (English)In: EARLI 2015: Book of Abstracts, 2015Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

A key question concerning the use of visual illustrations in teaching is whether teaching should be adapted according to students’ preferred learning style (visualiser-verbaliser), whether focus should be on strategies that work well in general (multimedia learning), independent of preference, or whether it is worthwhile to combine the two to further improve learning. Upper secondary school students were given a lecture presented only verbally or with the aid of a visual illustration. Results from a learning test were analysed in relation to the students’ self rated learning style. Visouverbal presentation resulted in better learning than verbal presentation only, independently of learning style. Support was not found for the learning styles hypothesis, since there was no crossover interaction. However, students with mixed or visual learning styles performed generally better on the learning test than students with a verbal learning style. Since the use of visual illustrations seems to have a beneficial effect on learning for all students, this mode of instruction ought to be used in teaching. Rather than being a tool for teachers to adapt their teaching, learning styles diagnoses may be used in order to identify students who need to develop their study strategies towards a more visual preference.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
Keywords [en]
Quantitative methods, Student learning, Comprehension of text and graphics, Social sciences, Secondary education
National Category
Educational Sciences Psychology
Research subject
Didactics; Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-155275OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-155275DiVA, id: diva2:1198340
Conference
16th Biennial EARLI conference, Limassol, Cyprus 25-29 August, 2015
Available from: 2018-04-17 Created: 2018-04-17 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Jägerskog, Ann-SofieJönsson, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jägerskog, Ann-SofieJönsson, Fredrik
By organisation
Centre for Teaching and Learning in the Social Sciences (CeSam)Department of Psychology
Educational SciencesPsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 276 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf