Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Investigating teacher learning from a university programme for Foundation Phase teachers
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Science Education. University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4317-7335
2018 (English)In: South African Journal of Childhood Education, ISSN 2223-7674, E-ISSN 2223-7682, Vol. 8, no 1, article id a524Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: There is a growing focus in South Africa on teachers developing appropriate knowledge, skills and dispositions for teaching to support young learners’ development and learning. One such teacher development programme is the Advanced Certificate in Teaching for Foundation Phase teachers, offered by the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN). This research sought to establish the learning of this sample of teachers as this was the first time the programme was offered at this level in South Africa and in UKZN.

Aim: The study investigated the knowledge the teachers said they gained, how they acquired it and ways in which they said learning improved their classroom practices.

Methods: This was a qualitative study. Data were generated from 26 participants through two rounds of focus group interviews in June 2013 and in November 2014. Data were analysed thematically using concepts of accommodation or assimilation, and practical or conceptual knowledge.

Results: Respondents’ statements indicated development of a range of practical knowledge about planning and teaching strategies, and conceptual knowledge like child development, creative play, circle of courage and others. Teachers also reported ways in which their classroom practices had improved. However, both institution- and student-related learning barriers emerged during the first semester around programme demands and poor curriculum delivery.

Conclusion: Respondents reported more about acquiring practical than conceptual knowledge and having improved practices in many ways. Participants also reported gaining conceptual knowledge around child development, circle of courage, and learning barriers. They acquired these kinds of knowledge through both assimilation and accommodation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 8, no 1, article id a524
Keywords [en]
Foundation Phase, assimilation, accommodation, procedural teacher knowledge, practical teacher knowledge, conceptual teacher knowledge, learning barriers
National Category
Learning
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157912DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v8i1.524ISI: 000438687200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-157912DiVA, id: diva2:1228131
Available from: 2018-06-27 Created: 2018-06-27 Last updated: 2018-08-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Christiansen, Iben
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Science Education
In the same journal
South African Journal of Childhood Education
Learning

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf