Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Global Assessment of Accountability in Water and Sanitation Services Using GLAAS Data
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography. Stockholm International Water Institute, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography. Stockholm International Water Institute, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52018 (English)In: Water Alternatives, ISSN 1965-0175, E-ISSN 1965-0175, Vol. 11, no 2, p. 238-259Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water (GLAAS) is one of UN-Water's regular reports. Its focuses include aspects of investment and the enabling environment for the delivery of water, sanitation and hygiene services. Accountability refers to the mechanisms through which duty bearers, elected officials and service providers report to rights holders and other stakeholders within the service delivery framework. Accountability contributes to good sector performance and the overall sustainability of services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of accountability in the drinking-water and sanitation sector globally, based on the available data from the GLAAS survey of 2014. To achieve this, accountability was defined from a human rights perspective, and particularised for water and sanitation. Next the quantitative and open-ended questions from the GLAAS survey that related to this definition were analysed for all 94 responding countries. Comparisons were drawn between water and sanitation services in urban and rural settings, and regional trends were identified. The results show higher levels of accountability for water than sanitation services, and limited information on wastewater. Potential means to strengthen accountability in water and sanitation globally are seen to include improving access to information on the services provided, enacting participation policies and increasing the capacity of regulatory institutions. Particular attention should be paid to rural services. The GLAAS survey could be modified for a better understanding of the accountability mechanisms for WASH service provision.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 11, no 2, p. 238-259
Keywords [en]
Accountability, water, sanitation, urban, rural, global, GLAAS, regulation, information, participation, human rights, WASH
National Category
Social and Economic Geography Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157672ISI: 000434449200002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-157672DiVA, id: diva2:1235993
Available from: 2018-07-30 Created: 2018-07-30 Last updated: 2018-07-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Free full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Livsey, JohnÅhlén, Imenne
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography
In the same journal
Water Alternatives
Social and Economic GeographyEarth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf