Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impacts of the water framework directive on learning and knowledge practices in a Swedish catchment
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2325-1609
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52018 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 223, p. 731-742Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Catchments are complex social-ecological systems involving multiple, and often competing, interests. Water governance and management regimes are increasingly embracing pluralistic, participatory, and holistic norms as a means to engage with issues of complexity, uncertainty, and value-conflicts. Integrated, participatory approaches are theoretically linked to improved learning amongst stakeholders across sectors and decision-making that is grounded in shared knowledge, experiences and scientific evidence. However, few studies have empirically examined the impacts of an integrated approach to learning and knowledge practices related to water resources. Here, a Swedish sub-catchment that has adopted such an approach in association with implementation of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) is examined. Interview-based analyses show that WFD implementation has both helped and hindered learning and knowledge practices surrounding both water planning and spatial planning. Whilst communities of practice have developed in the study area, a number of important challenges remain. These include the rigid goal-orientation of the WFD, the fragmentation of knowledge caused by an over-reliance on external consultants, as well as a lack of resources to synthesise information from multiple sources. Present results raise questions regarding the efficacy of the WFD to sufficiently enable the development of learning and knowledge practices capable of handling the complexity, uncertainties and value-conflicts facing catchments in Sweden and elsewhere.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 223, p. 731-742
Keywords [en]
Water framework directive, Sustainable water governance, Collaborative learning, Knowledge management, Communities of practice
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Physical Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-160192DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.054ISI: 000442057500073PubMedID: 29986320OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-160192DiVA, id: diva2:1251343
Available from: 2018-09-27 Created: 2018-09-27 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Unravelling Sustainability: The complex dynamics of emergent environmental governance and management systems at multiple scales
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Unravelling Sustainability: The complex dynamics of emergent environmental governance and management systems at multiple scales
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis adopts a complex systems approach to investigate the dynamic emergence of sustainable environmental governance and management systems in multiple contexts in Europe. Accelerating rates of environmental degradation across the world have called the legitimacy of previous environmental governance and management arrangements into question. Top-down, linear optimisation approaches have failed to account for the inherent complexity of social-ecological systems, upon which human society is entirely reliant for long-term survival. Systemic interdependence between ecological and human systems underscores the “wicked” nature of environmental problems, which are characterised by multi-dimensional values and competing interests among stakeholders and actors at multiple levels and across divergent spatial and temporal scales. Sustainability objectives therefore mandate the evolution of new environmental governance and management systems that are capable of engaging with complexity and dynamism. Employing a methodology based on comprehensive literature assessment, case studies and qualitative systems modelling methods, this thesis clearly identifies the structurally complex systems within which studied environmental governance and management arrangements took place. However, the degree to which these systems indicated the emergence of integrated and/or adaptive approaches, proposed by recent sustainability theories, was more uneven across governance levels and contexts. Key constraints related to the continued dominance of top-down institutional and regulatory frameworks, the availability of adequate inputs (primarily financial) for new approaches and initiatives, socio-cultural influences, and to the complexity and concomitant uncertainty of social-ecological system dynamics. Identified opportunities from across cases related to supra-national institutions, a shift of value preferences amongst stakeholders, and the perverse opportunities arising from chronic environmental degradation and/or acute social/ecological crises. Strategies enabling emergent governance and management approaches included strengthening the legitimacy of new actors, actively managing and integrating the perceptions of stakeholders, learning by doing and sharing, and recruiting and enabling active, hybridised leadership. Importantly, key constraints and opportunities remain largely out of reach for actors and stakeholders at lower levels. Feedback mechanisms by which bottom-up initiatives can influence higher level institutional development are lacking, poorly understood, or are dominated by long delays. These dynamics impede sustainability transitions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, 2019. p. 98
Series
Dissertations in Physical Geography, ISSN 2003-2358 ; 1
Keywords
Integrated adaptive environmental governance and management, Social-ecological system dynamics, Complex systems, Sustainability transitions, Sustainability strategies, Multi-level governance, Causal loop diagrams, Green Infrastructure, Landscape restoration, Habitat restoration, Biodiversity conservation, Comprehensive planning, Stakeholder participation, System thinking, Water Framework Directive, Sustainable water governance, Collaborative learning, Communities of practice, Knowledge management
National Category
Physical Geography Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Physical Geography
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-167024 (URN)978-91-7797-666-0 (ISBN)978-91-7797-667-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2019-05-29, William-Olssonsalen, Geovetenskapens hus, Svante Arrhenius väg 14, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2011-1737
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following paper was unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 4: Manuscript.

Available from: 2019-05-06 Created: 2019-03-29 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Dawson, LucasPersson, KlasJarsjö, Jerker

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dawson, LucasPersson, KlasJarsjö, Jerker
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf