Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The empirical support for mindfulness-based interventions for common psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Clinical psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4351-2810
Number of Authors: 32018 (English)In: Psychological Medicine, ISSN 0033-2917, E-ISSN 1469-8978, Vol. 48, no 13, p. 2116-2129Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have become widely used for common mental disorders (CMDs) but the state of the evidence has not been sufficiently investigated. The aims for this study were: (1) to quantify the effect size of MBIs for CMDs in the acute phase; (2) to explore moderator variables; and (3) to evaluate the evidence status of MBIs for the CMDs it has been tried for. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted. RCTs that evaluated MBI and included patients with a primary manifest CMD was included. Methodological quality, the risk of bias, publication bias and evidence status were assessed. Literature searches gave 2448 hits and 19 studies were included. MBIs were more effective than no treatment (g = 1.07) and treatment-as-usual (g = 0.40) but not in comparison to placebo (g = 0.17) or other active treatments (g = -0.01). Methodological quality was negatively correlated with outcome. For all psychiatric disorders it has been tested, MBIs were judged to have weak or no empirical support. The conclusion of the study is that the evidence-base for MBIs for CMDs in the acute phase is weak.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 48, no 13, p. 2116-2129
Keywords [en]
clinical efficacy, common psychiatric disorders, evidence status, meta-analysis, mindfulness-based interventions
National Category
Psychology Psychiatry
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-160180DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718000259ISI: 000443816200002PubMedID: 29455695OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-160180DiVA, id: diva2:1252746
Available from: 2018-10-02 Created: 2018-10-02 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Öst, Lars-Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öst, Lars-Göran
By organisation
Clinical psychology
In the same journal
Psychological Medicine
PsychologyPsychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 284 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf