Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The strength of weak embodiment
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Perception and psychophysics.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52018 (English)In: International Journal of Psychological Research, ISSN 2011-2084, E-ISSN 2011-7922, Vol. 11, no 2, p. 77-85Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

While popular within some cognitive science approaches, the embodiment approach has still found resistance, particularly in light of evidence arguing against strong forms of embodiment. Among other things, the embodiment approach breaks away from the Cartesian ontology of the modulatory system. We claim that the advantages of the embodiment approach are: a) it grounds cognition into modal experience, b) it is harmonious with a materialist philosophy of mind (emergent materialism), and c) it is supported by experimental research in various fields. However, embodiment must still address abstractions, theoretical misunderstandings (representations vs non-representations) and neuroscientific findings that challenge the extension and relevance of sensorimotor properties into cognitive processes. While the strong version of embodiment is seriously challenged by conceptual and physiological setbacks, its weak version is supported by compelling evidence. We suggest future research focus on the psychophysiological bases of grounded cognition and redirect efforts towards the field of cross-modal correspondence.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 11, no 2, p. 77-85
Keywords [en]
the modulatory system, embodiment, emergent materialism, cross-modal correspondence
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-161236DOI: 10.21500/20112084.3420ISI: 000444307200009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-161236DiVA, id: diva2:1256797
Available from: 2018-10-18 Created: 2018-10-18 Last updated: 2019-01-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tirado, Carlos
By organisation
Perception and psychophysics
In the same journal
International Journal of Psychological Research
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 46 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf