Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rank uncertainty: why the “most popular” baby names might not be the most popular
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0423-6702
2017 (English)In: Significance, ISSN 1740-9705, E-ISSN 1740-9713, Vol. 14, no 3, p. 30-33Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.)) Published
Abstract [en]

Soon‐to‐be parents, souvenir mug producers and onomatologists are all equally fascinated by baby name statistics. But end‐of‐year lists of the most popular names fail to account for uncertainty says Michael Höhle. Can we trust the rankings?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 14, no 3, p. 30-33
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-164871DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2017.01037.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-164871DiVA, id: diva2:1280580
Available from: 2019-01-19 Created: 2019-01-19 Last updated: 2019-02-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Höhle, Michael
By organisation
Department of Mathematics
In the same journal
Significance
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf