Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Acquisition integration flexibility: toward a conceptual framework
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4035-9531
2018 (English)In: Journal of Strategy and Management., ISSN 1755-425X, E-ISSN 1755-4268, Vol. 11, no 4, p. 434-448Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to develop the role of integration flexibility as a mediator of acquisition performance and demonstrate how this capability varies across firms.

Design/methodology/approach

The study develops a conceptual framework of anticipated relationships by building on existing but so far unintegrated acquisition research.

Findings

The study suggests integration flexibility provides an explanation for variance in acquisition performance. The study identifies drivers behind acquisition integration flexibility in acquirer characteristics, deal characteristics and integration management. The authors further specify the positive and negative impact of several key factors commonly discussed in acquisition research.

Research limitations/implications

Integration flexibility stands out as a novel explanation for acquisition performance. Still, the benefits from flexibility are not universal and developed logic suggests it represents a dynamic capability for acquirers. Our framework helps predict which acquirers and deals are more likely demonstrating this capability, thus contributing to predict acquisition performance.

Practical implications

Acquisitions often take place in dynamic environments and reportedly often fail. Predicting and developing acquisition integration flexibility stands out as an important task for acquiring management.

Social implications

Annual global acquisition values are on par with the GDP of large industrial nations (e.g. Germany) and failures for reasons of lacking acquisition integration flexibility contributes to value destruction harming not only firms, but society at large. Improved integration flexibility likely mediates this risk.

Originality/value

Making an acquisition to adapt to environmental change implicitly assumes greater integration that can limit flexibility. While our argument builds on key concepts from acquisition research these so far have remained unconnected in relation to acquisition integration flexibility. The authors develop factors influencing this important capability and show how it mediates acquisition performance. This links acquisition antecedents with integration or phases typically treated separately.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 11, no 4, p. 434-448
Keywords [en]
Performance, Flexibility, Integration, Acquisitions, Capabilities, Merger
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-164985DOI: 10.1108/JSMA-05-2018-0049OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-164985DiVA, id: diva2:1280970
Available from: 2019-01-21 Created: 2019-01-21 Last updated: 2019-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schriber, Svante
By organisation
Stockholm Business School
In the same journal
Journal of Strategy and Management.
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf