Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
You told me, Right? Free and Informed Consent in European Patent Law
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law, The Institute of Intellectual Property Law and Marketing Law.
2019 (English)In: Global Genes, Local Concerns: Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Challenges in International Biobanking / [ed] Timo Minssen, Janne Rothmar Herrmann, Jens Schovsbo,, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper concerns the rule in EU patent law that for patent applications pertaining to human biological material the person from whose body the material is taken must have had the opportunity of expressing free and informed consent (FIC) in accordance with national law. We argue that the patent rules should be understood in the light of the development in health law and fundamental rights law where FIC has long been a central concept which is e.g. recognized in the EU’s Charter on Fundamental Rights. Against that basis, we suggest that patent law and patent practices have so far not fully recognized the importance and central role of FIC. For these reasons, non-compliance with the FIC-requirement arguably has the potential to be used to challenge patent validity. Whereas patent law clearly should acknowledge the importance of the FIC-obligations, we suggest that the effects of this should be measured carefully and with a view of maintaining the overall balancing of interests. We, therefore, recommend that even though non-compliance with the provisions on FIC does in fact have the potential to invalidate patents, this should only happen in those rare circumstances where such non-compliance would amount to not only a violation of legal rules but also amount to a serious violation of principles of ordre public or morality in line with current patent law standards.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.
Keywords [en]
patent, free and informed consent, health law, fundamental rights
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-167980ISBN: 9781788116183 (print)ISBN: 9781788116190 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-167980DiVA, id: diva2:1304627
Available from: 2019-04-12 Created: 2019-04-12 Last updated: 2019-04-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Available at SSRN

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hellstadius, Åsa
By organisation
The Institute of Intellectual Property Law and Marketing Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf