Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analys och värdering: en studie i svensk konstkritik 1930-35
1982 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

During the early thirties there were intensive discussions on the conditions and functions of art. The purpose of this theses is to investigate how the taste and attitudes to art of a particular period of time are mirrored in the contemporary art criticism and to analyse how these attitudes are expressed. The work contains a descriptive and an analytical section. Seven of the ten Stockholm newspapers had critics writing regularly. The art galleries were few. Thus, the critics had the opportunity to attend all the exhibitions that were offered. Among the critics were the enthusiastic Gustaf Näsström and the doctrinaire Gotthard Johansson. Here we find the artists Yngve Berg and Otto G Carlsund, the poets Gunnar Mascoll Silfverstolpe and Karl Asplund, the art historian Nils Palmgren and the author Erik Blomberg. Vitalistic colourism and surrealism were introduced. Functionalism had its breakthrough and the trend of primitivistic anti-intellectualism and anti-aestheticism were discussed as well as the exclusivity of abstract painting. Two different positions of aesthetic description and evaluation are observed. First, there is the critic who tries to understand the intention of the artist and to determine how well he has succeeded in making his intention clear. Second, there is the critic who communicates his own private experience of a work of art. Each critic has either consciously or unconsciously his own idea of the rôle of value judgements. A relativistic attitude is most frequent. The criteria for artistic value vary. While one critic prefers a work of art which reflects contemporary life, another prefers to judge a work of art according to purely formal standards. All agree that a great work of art must possess ”truth”, ”sincerity” and ”genuineness”. In conclusion some typical features in the disposition of the reviews and some stylistic elements are examined. The purpose is to offer a guide to the reading of art criticism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Stockholm University, 1982. , p. 205
National Category
Humanities and the Arts
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-174915Libris ID: 7608371ISBN: 91-7146-300-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-174915DiVA, id: diva2:1360651
Public defence
1982-06-02, Hörsal 10, Hus E, Frescati, Stockholm, 10:00
Note

With an English summary

Available from: 2019-10-14 Created: 2019-10-14 Last updated: 2019-10-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

PDF (Not accessible to users outside Sweden)
Humanities and the Arts

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf