Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Navigating towards the Safe Operating Space: Systems thinking and the SDGs
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. (Planetary Boundaries team)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4303-9744
2019 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Can the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals be reached within the Planetary Boundaries? This licentiate thesis aims to explore this question by navigating towards the safe operating space, as defined by the planetary boundaries, through integrating issues, disciplines, scales, models and stakeholders. The thesis is a milestone within the European Union financed project “Adaptation to a New Economic Reality (AdaptEconII)”. Besides the SDGs and planetary boundaries, I embark from a curiosity about systems and their dynamics and explore the interface of system dynamics formalism and global social-ecological systems resilience applications. A practical aim is to also inform the SDG implementation process by guiding cross-scale SDG implementation through offering modeling insights (the Human Needs Paper II) and a stakeholder approach for goal implementation (the African Dialogue Paper I).

 

In the African Dialogue paper, I present the first stakeholder-based approach of visioning and exploring Sustainable Development Pathways to meet the SDGs. I embark from the Three horizons framework - a participatory approach which involves participants in visioning and unpacking complex issues to elicit views about future aspirations, current challenges and pathways to addressing and achieving them. The paper first introduces how the Three horizons approach was built on, and adapted to, the 2030 Agenda. Together with the co-authors, I developed the method to enable addressing a spectrum of challenges for SDG implementation and incorporate alternative narratives with a wholistic view of the 2030 Agenda’s implementation. We wanted to facilitate the discovery of a few alternative pathways and include a discussion on global pathways to contrast them against. In the paper, I discuss the benefits and challenges of the adapted approach in relation to its implementation in an illustrative case study, the 2018 African Dialogue on The World In 2050, which deliberated on future pathways for agriculture and food systems in Africa. The process enabled discussions on commonalities and differences between a diversity of future visions for Africa, grounded in different cultural contexts, and their implications for the global scale. All four stakeholder groups included the importance of youth and women empowerment, and the need for climate adaptation to reach the SDGs in their pathways. The groups diverged when it came to whether future population growth should be seen as positive or negative for African futures, and whether agribusinesses or cooperatives should dominate the agricultural sector. The developed frame, Three Horizons for SDGs (3H4SDG), represents a versatile approach for a participatory design of future pathways to reach SDGs, inclusive to marginalized voices and facilitating a context-sensitive exploration of alternative futures.

 

In the Human Needs paper, I accentuate that sustainability means meeting human needs now, and in the future. The 2030 Agenda’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent global ambitions to meet human needs, but prospects are unclear for meeting SDGs without worsening environmental deterioration. In constructing a world model to explore SDG-related risks to Earth system resilience, I examined historic correlations, 1980-2015, between production measured as income per person and advancement on the human-needs goals, SDGs 1-7, for seven world regions and the world as a whole. In the paper I present uniform patterns of saturation for all regions above a clear income threshold – at a level where human needs and capabilities are met, consistent with happiness economics and the Easterlin paradox. I observe stark differences with respect to scale: the world as a whole behaves differently from all its seven regions. And I argue that these differences between historical regional patterns give vital hints on how SDGs can be reached within Earth’s safe operating space.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm University, 2019.
Keywords [en]
2030 Agenda, visioning, scenarios, Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs, Three horizons, transformation, The World In 2050, Planetary Boundaries, Safe Operating Space, Plural economics, Doughnut Economics, Human Needs, Capability approach, Easterlin paradox, Sustainability, System Dynamics
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Sustainability Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-176016OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-176016DiVA, id: diva2:1370548
Presentation
2019-11-28, 237, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Kräftriket 2B, Stockholm, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 675153Available from: 2019-11-15 Created: 2019-11-15 Last updated: 2019-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

summary(111 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name SUMMARY01.pdfFile size 111 kBChecksum SHA-512
152ead699fc6fef580c6812495613c314f14783aee09d18a5464c47c5c21d9c7b1ebcfd9c2b50f93620bc189c0948f2a97ac179dcd6811f788975ede9a7b7df0
Type summaryMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Collste, David
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf