Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Learning from results-based management evaluations and reviews
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
2019 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

What have we learned from implementing results-based management in development co-operation organisations? What progress and benefits can be seen? What are the main challenges and unintended consequences? Are there good practices to address these challenges?

To respond to these questions this paper reviews and analyses the findings from various evaluations and reviews of results-based management systems conducted by members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), the OECD/DAC Results Community Secretariat and other bodies in the past four years (2015-2018). It also draws on emerging lessons from new methods for managing development co-operation results.

This analytical work aims to:

  1. identify recent trends in results-based management,
  2. explore challenges faced by providers when developing their results approaches and systems,
  3. select good practices in responding to these challenges that can be useful for the OECD/DACResults Community, considering new approaches, new technologies and evolving contexts.

This body of evidence will inform the development of a core set of generic guiding principles for results-based management in development co-operation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OECD , 2019. , p. 43
Series
OECD Development co-operation working papers, E-ISSN 2222-0518 ; 53
Keywords [en]
development co-operation, SDGs, Agenda 2030, data, evidence-based, payment by results, aggregation, results framework, results-based management, adaptive management, standard indicators, performance measurement
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-176481DOI: 10.1787/3fda0081-enOAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-176481DiVA, id: diva2:1376348
Projects
Towards an organisational theory on Obsessive Measurement DisorderAvailable from: 2019-12-09 Created: 2019-12-09 Last updated: 2019-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vähämäki, Janet
By organisation
Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE)
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf