Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Proper Names and Relational Modality
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
2006 (English)In: Linguistics and Philosophy, ISSN 0165-0157, E-ISSN 1573-0549, Vol. 29, no 5, 507-535 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Saul Kripke’s thesis that ordinary proper names are rigid designators is supported by widely shared intuitions about the occurrence of names in ordinary modal contexts. By those intuitions names are scopeless with respect to the modal expressions. That is, sentences in a pair like (a) Aristotle might have been fond of dogs, (b) Concerning Aristotle, it is true that he might have been fond of dogs will have the same truth value. The same does not in general hold for definite descriptions. If one, like Kripke, accounts for this difference by means of the intensions of the names and the descriptions, the conclusion is that names do not in general have the same intension as any normal, identifying description. However, this difference can be accounted for alternatively by appeal to the semantics of the modal expressions. On the account we suggest, dubbed ‘relational modality’, simple singular terms, like proper names, contribute to modal contexts simply by their actual world reference, not by their descriptive content. That account turns out to be fully equivalent with the rigidity account when it comes to truth of modal and non-modal sentence (with respect to the actual world), and hence supports the same basic intuitions. Here we present the relational modality account and compare it with others, in particular Kripke’s own

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer , 2006. Vol. 29, no 5, 507-535 p.
Keyword
Actuality, Definite descriptions, Kripke, Modality, Necessity, Possible worlds semantics, Proper names, Rigid designators, Two-dimensionalism, Truth
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-8602DOI: 10.1007/s10988-006-9001-7OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-8602DiVA: diva2:139414
Note
PAVAAvailable from: 2009-01-22 Created: 2009-01-22 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(299 kB)227 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 299 kBChecksum SHA-512
cd017055cb0c72f42c63dfe7d2579602f5bf221a7adb5262bb384b02909af6fe9912ee6e6b57b513cc6533d3eb8eb3ac9aae295e3a039157b2e01de4f54170f3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glüer, KathrinPagin, Peter
By organisation
Department of Philosophy
In the same journal
Linguistics and Philosophy
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 227 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 159 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf