Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Alternatives to Resistance? Comparing Depoliticization in Two British Environmental Movement Scenes
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
Number of Authors: 12020 (English)In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, ISSN 0309-1317, E-ISSN 1468-2427, Vol. 44, no 1, p. 124-144Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Processes of politicization and depoliticization are increasingly studied in relation to urban contexts, and cities have been depicted as incubators of social movements. What has been largely ignored is why, in some cities, forces of politicization or depoliticization are stronger than in others. To address this question, this article compares two British cities-Manchester and Bristol-which have historically been central hubs of environmental resistance, but currently face similar depoliticizing forces: austerity, anti-squatting laws, police repression and activists' disillusion with environmentalism. Curiously, these conditions have had very different impacts on the two environmental scenes. In Manchester they have caused environmental resistance to become replaced almost entirely by non-confrontational 'alternatives'. In Bristol alternatives have emerged that tend to be in synergy with environmental resistance. The comparison thus suggests that Bristol is more conducive to maintaining environmental resistance under depoliticizing conditions. Findings suggest that differences can be attributed to features of the physical urban environment, including city size. Historically, these differences were not decisive. Yet, after a period of dwindling environmentalist energy in the UK, the number of environmentalist hubs has been reduced. This has prompted a reputational snowball that increasingly concentrates environmental resistance in the one city that best insulates the environmental movement from broader depoliticizing forces.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 44, no 1, p. 124-144
Keywords [en]
Social movements, environmental activism, politicization and depoliticization, comparative urban analysis, resistance and alternatives, Manchester, Bristol, UK, Regional & Urban Planning
National Category
Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-178615DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12860ISI: 000506367300001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-178615DiVA, id: diva2:1414056
Available from: 2020-03-12 Created: 2020-03-12 Last updated: 2020-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
de Moor, Joost
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Social and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf