Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sustainable sources need reliable standards
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Organic Chemistry.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6543-7674
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Organic Chemistry.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8184-8358
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Organic Chemistry.
Number of Authors: 42017 (English)In: Faraday discussions, ISSN 1359-6640, E-ISSN 1364-5498, Vol. 202, p. 281-301Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This review discusses the challenges within the research area of modern biomass fractionation and valorization. The current pulping industry focuses on pulp production and the resulting cellulose fiber. Hemicellulose and lignin are handled as low value streams for process heat and the regeneration of process chemicals. The paper and pulp industry have therefore developed analytical techniques to evaluate the cellulose fiber, while the other fractions are given a low priority. In a strive to also use the hemicellulose and lignin fractions of lignocellulosic biomass, moving towards a biorefining concept, there are severe shortcomings with the current pulping techniques and also in the analysis of the biomass. Lately, new fractionation techniques have emerged which valorize a larger extent of the lignocellulosic biomass. This progress has disclosed the shortcomings in the analysis of mainly the hemicellulose and lignin structure and properties. To move the research field forward, analytical tools for both the raw material, targeting all the wood components, and the generated fractions, as well as standardized methods for evaluating and reporting yields are desired. At the end of this review, a discourse on how such standardizations can be implemented is given.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 202, p. 281-301
National Category
Chemical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-180170DOI: 10.1039/c7fd00046dISI: 000411412300017PubMedID: 28671698OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-180170DiVA, id: diva2:1415662
Available from: 2020-03-19 Created: 2020-03-19 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Galkin, Maxim V.Di Francesco, DavideSamec, Joseph S. M.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Galkin, Maxim V.Di Francesco, DavideSamec, Joseph S. M.
By organisation
Department of Organic Chemistry
In the same journal
Faraday discussions
Chemical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf