Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Measuring Alliance Toward Embodied Virtual Therapists in the Era of Automated Treatments With the Virtual Therapist Alliance Scale (VTAS): Development and Psychometric Evaluation
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Clinical psychology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Clinical psychology.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, E-ISSN 1438-8871, Vol. 22, no 3, article id e16660Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Automated virtual reality exposure therapies (VRETs) are self-help treatments conducted by oneself and supported by a virtual therapist embodied visually and/or with audio feedback. This simulates many of the nonspecific relational elements and common factors present in face-to-face therapy and may be a means of improving adherence to and efficacy of self-guided treatments. However, little is known about alliance toward the virtual therapist, despite alliance being an important predictor of treatment outcome.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the first alliance instrument developed for use with embodied virtual therapists in an automated treatment format—the Virtual Therapist Alliance Scale (VTAS)—by (1) assessing its psychometric properties, (2) verifying the dimensionality of the scale, and (3) determining the predictive ability of the scale with treatment outcome.

Methods: A psychometric evaluation and exploratory factor analysis of the VTAS was conducted using data from two samples of spider-fearful patients treated with VRET and the help of an embodied, voice-based virtual therapist (n=70). Multiple regression models and bivariate correlations were used to assess the VTAS relationship with treatment outcome, according to self-reported fear and convergence with presence and user-friendliness process measures.

Results: The VTAS showed a sound two-factor solution composed of a primary factor covering task, goal, and copresence; adequate internal consistency; and good convergent validity, including moderate correlation (r=.310, P=.01) with outcomes over follow-up.

Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that alliance toward a virtual therapist is a significant predictor of treatment outcome, favors the importance of a task-goal over bond-factor, and should be explored in studies with larger sample sizes and in additional forms of embodiment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 22, no 3, article id e16660
Keywords [en]
alliance, virtual reality, exposure therapy, automated treatment, psychometric, embodiment, virtual therapist, virtual coach, avatar, usability, presence, empathy
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-180522DOI: 10.2196/16660ISI: 000521234700001PubMedID: 32207690OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-180522DiVA, id: diva2:1420601
Available from: 2020-03-31 Created: 2020-03-31 Last updated: 2024-01-17Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Exposure therapy for specific phobia involving systematic and repeated presentation of an aversive stimuli or situation is a highly effective treatment for reducing fear and anxiety. Dissemination of this evidence-based treatment has proved challenging, however, and for over 20 years an alternative method of delivery using virtual reality technology has been explored with positive results. This thesis consists of three empirical studies examining a new generation of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) that by using automation, inexpensive hardware, and downloadable software aims to ensure that a highly efficacious exposure therapy can be made available to almost anyone. Study I evaluated the efficacy of this novel automated VRET for spider phobia as compared to gold-standard in-vivo one-session treatment (OST) using a randomized non-inferiority design. Results indicated that large effect size reductions in self-reported fear were evident at post-assessment in both treatments and the automated VRET was not inferior to OST at 3- and 12-months follow-up according to behavioral approach test, but was significantly worse until 12-month follow-up. No significant difference was noted on a questionnaire measuring negative effects of treatment. Study II conducted a process measure evaluation of patient alliance towards the virtual therapist used in the VRET treatment with a purpose-built questionnaire entitled the Virtual Therapist Alliance Scale (VTAS). Exploratory factor analysis indicated a sound two-factor solution composed of a primary task, goal and co-presence factor and a secondary bond and empathy factor. Psychometric evaluation of the VTAS suggested good internal consistency, and a moderate correlation between the VTAS and change in self-reported fear over follow-up. Study III assessed what individuals with a fear of spiders found most frightening about spiders. Both quantitative ratings and qualitative descriptions indicated that movement characteristics were reported as most fear provoking and to a lesser extent appearance characteristics, however factor analysis of scores in these categories did not find a correlation with participant baseline self-reported fear. Overall, the above findings suggest that VRET is a potential alternative to OST for the treatment of spider phobia also with respect to therapist alliance, and spider movement characteristics should be emphasized in future VRET treatments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 2020. p. 114
Keywords
Specific phobia, spider phobia, spider, fear, anxiety, virtual reality, exposure therapy, automated, alliance, psychometric, factor analysis, virtual therapist, RCT, randomized, non-inferiority, clinical trial, dissemination, 12-month follow-up
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-180746 (URN)978-91-7911-114-4 (ISBN)978-91-7911-115-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-05-29, David Magnussonsalen (U31), Frescati Hagväg 8, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-05-06 Created: 2020-04-08 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Miloff, AlexanderCarlbring, PerLindner, Philip

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Miloff, AlexanderCarlbring, PerLindner, Philip
By organisation
Clinical psychology
In the same journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf