Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Towards a socio-ecological spatial morphology: a joint network approach to urban form and landscape ecology
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. University of Gävle, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2637-2024
Number of Authors: 32020 (English)In: Urban morphology, ISSN 1027-4278, Vol. 24, no 1, p. 21-34Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Interest in the green infrastructure of cities has rapidly increased in recent years. The reasons are several but generally relate to the great increase of research and policy on sustainable urban development. Of particular importance here is the more recent shift in this field towards greater emphasis on biodiversity and urban ecosystems and not only climate change and environmental engineering. This shift brings new demands for a deeper understanding of the morphology of green infrastructures in cities, understood as ecological environments and not only as areas for human use, as has been the general case in urban morphology. In an earlier paper (Marcus et al., 2019), we discussed how descriptions of landscape patterns of both urban and natural kinds, as developed in urban morphology and landscape ecology respectively, could be integrated into a joint socio-ecological spatial morphology. That paper outlined a framework for such a morphology where green (and blue) as well as built-up areas in cities can be jointly described as configurations of patches. However, the discussion in that paper does not address how to capture the relation between such configurations and the processes that they structure, or how such processes over time may alter such configurations, which is the aim of the present paper. It does so by extending the theory of generic function (Hillier, 1996) to other species than humans, and by applying the theory of affordances (Gibson, 1986) as a means to develop distance measures specific for different species. The origin of the discussion in both papers is the need for progress in sustainable urban development for which this relation is vital, since if we are to address the function of both urban and ecological systems through spatial form, we need to develop an understanding of how such patterns underpin and structure urban and ecological systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 24, no 1, p. 21-34
Keywords [en]
urban morphology, landscape ecology, sustainability, socio-ecological urbanism, urban design
National Category
Landscape Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-185170DOI: 10.51347/jum.v24i1.4088ISI: 000560478800003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-185170DiVA, id: diva2:1468359
Available from: 2020-09-17 Created: 2020-09-17 Last updated: 2025-02-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Barthel, Stephan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Barthel, Stephan
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Urban morphology
Landscape Architecture

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 855 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf