Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What is Number of Days in Number of Times?: Associations Between, and Responsiveness of, Two Sickness Presenteeism Measures
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 82020 (English)In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, ISSN 1076-2752, E-ISSN 1536-5948, Vol. 62, no 5, p. e180-e185Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To examine the associations between sickness presenteeism (SP) reported as number of days with SP reported as number of times and to evaluate their responsiveness.

Methods: The study population (n = 454) consisted of employed individuals, at risk of long-term sickness absence. Correlation analyses were performed to examine associations between the two SP measures and external constructs such as work performance, general health, and registered sick leave. Both SP constructs were measured several times to examine responsiveness.

Results: The SP measures are moderately correlated. They moderately correlated with work performance and health status measures. SP reported as number of times seems to be more sensitive than number of days in detecting changes after rehabilitation.

Conclusions: Numerical or categorical constructs are valid sources of data on SP. However, categorized SP seems to be more responsive.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 62, no 5, p. e180-e185
Keywords [en]
construct validity, rehabilitation, responsiveness, sick leave, sickness presenteeism
National Category
Health Sciences Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-185655DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001843ISI: 000561889200002PubMedID: 32097288OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-185655DiVA, id: diva2:1475100
Available from: 2020-10-12 Created: 2020-10-12 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Jensen, IreneAronsson, GunnarLeineweber, Constanze

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jensen, IreneAronsson, GunnarLeineweber, Constanze
By organisation
Work and organizational psychologyStress Research Institute
In the same journal
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Health SciencesPsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 679 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf