Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparison of πps designs
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Statistics.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Statistics.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A large number of probability proportional to size designs have been suggested in the literature. Practitioners will ask themselves if the choice of design matters and, if so, to what extent. We discuss what the desirable properties of a probability proportional to size designs are. We argue the main desirable property is reliability. Other desirable properties include simplicity and, in some contexts, if the sampling design admits sample coordination. We explore the numerical properties of ten probability proportional to size designs in a simulation study. Chromy’s and Sunter’s methods are strong contenders if there is no need of sample coordination. Sunter’s method does not render a strict probability proportional to size design as small units will be drawn with simple random sampling. Should one want to at least keep the possibility of future sample coordination open, order sampling, including sequential Poisson and Pareto sampling, is the best choice.

Keywords [en]
probability proportional to size without replacement, skewed populations, sampling algorithms, order sampling
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-185925OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-185925DiVA, id: diva2:1477251
Available from: 2020-10-17 Created: 2020-10-17 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Essays on Sample Surveys: Design and Estimation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Essays on Sample Surveys: Design and Estimation
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sampling is a core stage in every survey. A sampling design carefully elaborated may imply not only a more accurate estimation of the parameters of interest, but also a reduction in the required sample size in a study. In this thesis we consider two particular but connected subjects. On the one hand, the selection of samples with probabilities proportional to some prescribed values. The first two papers are devoted to this topic. On the other hand, the choice of sampling design to implement in a given survey, which is a topic to which the last two papers are devoted.

Probability proportional to size sampling designs, often referred to as πps designs, are of practical interest due to their potential efficiency. In the literature we can find many of these designs, all having different characteristics. In the first paper we describe and compare ten πps designs with respect to several desired properties. The results suggest that the so called order sampling methods, as well as those proposed by Sunter and Chromy may be considered as good options from a practitioner's point of view.

In the second paper we introduce an algorithm for approximating a target distribution by a mixture distribution. Being a mixture, most of its properties are easy to calculate. We illustrate the use of the algorithm with several examples, both univariate and multivariate. The results indicate that the algorithm succeeds in approximating the target distribution.

The strategy that couples πps designs with the generalized regression estimator is optimal under a given superpopulation model. However, this optimality assumes that the model is correct and some of its parameters are known, which are assumptions that are hardly satisfied in practice. In the third paper we introduce a method that allows for incorporating uncertainty about the model parameters into the choice of the sampling design and then quantifying this uncertainty with a risk measure. The method is illustrated with a real dataset. The results show that the method allowed us to correctly choose the sampling design. The risk measure -as well as other functions that are useful at the planning stage of a survey- is implemented in the package optimStrat developed for R. The fourth paper in this thesis describes the functions in this package.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Statistics, Stockholm University, 2020. p. 40
Keywords
GREG estimator, mixture distribution, probability proportional to size sampling, sampling algorithms, sampling design, sampling strategy, survey sampling, stratified sampling
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
Statistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-185930 (URN)978-91-7911-268-4 (ISBN)978-91-7911-269-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-12-04, Nordenskiöldsalen, Geovetenskapens hus, Svante Arrhenius väg 12, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-11-11 Created: 2020-10-17 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Bueno, EdgarHedlin, Dan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bueno, EdgarHedlin, Dan
By organisation
Department of Statistics
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 200 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf