Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Clinical psychology. Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Public Health Sciences. (REGAPS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5923-0092
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 62021 (English)In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, ISSN 1049-8931, E-ISSN 1557-0657, Vol. 30, no 2, article id e1865Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Diverse instruments are used to measure problem gambling and Gambling Disorder intervention outcomes. The 2004 Banff consensus agreement proposed necessary features for reporting gambling treatment efficacy. To address the challenge of including these features in a single instrument, a process was initiated to develop the Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT), as an instrument analogous to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test.

Methods: Gambling experts from 10 countries participated in an international two-round Delphi (n = 61; n = 30), rating 30 items proposed for inclusion in the GDIT. Gambling researchers and clinicians from several countries participated in three consensus meetings (n = 10; n = 4; n = 3). User feedback was obtained from individuals with experience of problem gambling (n = 12) and from treatment-seekers with Gambling Disorder (n = 8).

Results: Ten items fulfilled Delphi consensus criteria for inclusion in the GDIT (M >= 7 on a scale of 1-9 in the second round). Item-related issues were addressed, and four more items were added to conform to the Banff agreement recommendations, yielding a final draft version of the GDIT with 14 items in three domains: gambling behavior, gambling symptoms and negative consequences.

Conclusions: This study established preliminary construct and face validity for the GDIT.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 30, no 2, article id e1865
Keywords [en]
Delphi, gambling disorder, Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT), problem gambling, psychometric development
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Psychology
Research subject
Psychology; Public Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-187453DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1865ISI: 000591057900001PubMedID: 33220163OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-187453DiVA, id: diva2:1509061
Available from: 2020-12-11 Created: 2020-12-11 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Sundqvist, KristinaWennberg, PeterBerman, Anne H.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Molander, OlofSundqvist, KristinaWennberg, PeterBerman, Anne H.
By organisation
Clinical psychologyDepartment of Public Health Sciences
In the same journal
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Public Health, Global Health and Social MedicinePsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 92 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf